Science and Civilization in China. The Shorter Science and Civilisation.
Project MUSE , doi: East Asian Science, Technology, and Medicine. Oxford Bibliographies Online Datasets. Science and Society in East and West.
The Science of Thought, Vol. 2 (Classic Reprint)
By Joseph Needham, — Economic Development and Cultural Change. Retrieved from " https: Series of non-fiction books Science studies History books about China History of science and technology in China. Views Read Edit View history. This page was last edited on 3 November , at By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Similar books and articles
Science and Civilisation in China Chinese translation. Wang Ling research assistant. Wang Ling and Lu Gwei-djen collaborators.
We should all be grateful to the editors for selecting and contextualizing so rich a body of materials. Bringing the diverse contributions of feminism and other liberation struggles to the forefront, it offers a new approach to the teaching and study of social and political theory. Carefully edited readings are augmented with accessible introductions that trace the historical developments of political ideologies. Spanning traditions and ideological divides, The Broadview Anthology of Social and Political Thought is wonderfully adaptable to a variety of courses in political theory or history of political thought at virtually every level of higher education.
A detailed introduction to each section and each author provides a rich historical background to theories and theorists. Courses that utilize this volume will have abundant resources from which to familiarize students with the complexity and diversity of political thought from the past hundred plus years. The selections have not only been chosen with a keen eye for excellence, but are preceded by very helpful introductory essays.
The Science of Thought, Vol. 2 (Classic Reprint) | Bücher Doppler - Baden
It should prove an invaluable guide for students and scholars alike. In , Needham—along with an international team of collaborators—initiated the project to study the science, technology, and civilisation of ancient China. This project produced a series of volumes published by Cambridge University Press. Volume 3 of the encyclopedia was the first body of work to describe Chinese improvements to cartography , geology , seismology and mineralogy.
It also includes descriptions of nautical technology, sailing charts, and wheel-maps. Needham's transliteration of Chinese characters uses the Wade-Giles system, though the aspirate apostrophe e. However, it was abandoned in favor of the pinyin system by the NRI board in April , with Volume 5, Part 11 becoming the first to use the new system.
Armed with his new-found knowledge, Needham returned to Cambridge in and began working on a book with one of the Chinese medical students he met in Cambridge, Wang Ling , who was now a professor at a university. There have been two summaries or condensations of the vast amount of material found in Science and Civilisation. The first, a one-volume popular history book by Robert Temple entitled The Genius of China , was completed in a little over 12 months to be available in for the visit of Queen Elizabeth II to China.
The Nature of Thought, Vol. 2
This addressed only the contributions made by China and had a "warm welcome" from Joseph Needham in the introduction, though in the Beijing Review he criticized that it had "some mistakes An abridgement of Joseph Needham's original text , between and his death in Science and Civilisation in China is highly regarded among scholars because of its extensive comparative coverage of Chinese innovations. Editor of Volume 6, Nathan Sivin and Needham's research collaborator Lu Gwei-djen include updated research to support some of Needham's claims. However, Sivin is critical of Needham suggesting more research is required citing his assumptions of Taoisms' role in promoting scientific feats in China.
Needham's Science and Civilisation in China did not receive criticism from scholars in other fields of study. Jonathan Spence wrote in a New York Times article "this work is the most ambitious undertaking in Chinese studies during this century".