Give up (Suvina)

The said section then provides for consequential matters arising out of withdrawal of the application of the Act to the Planning areas. It is however, material to see that while preparing a scheme, under clause ii of sub-section 2 of section 19 of the Act determining the portion or portions of the balance of the fund of the Planning and Development Authority concerned which is to vest in the Government and in the local authority or authorities concerned, the Government has to consult the Board, the Planning and Development Authority and the local authority or authorities concerned.

Sub-section 1 of section 20 of the Act provides for constitution or establishment of the Planning and Development Authority by the Government in consultation with the Board, after any area is declared by it as a Planning area known as the "Planning and Development Authority" for the said area for the purpose of performing the functions assigned to it under the Act. Sub-section 2 of section 20 of the Act makes such "Planning and Development Authority" a body corporate with power to acquire, held and dispose of property both moveable and immoveable.

Sub-section 3 of section 20 of the Act provides for the composition of the Planning and Development Authority constituted under sub-section 1 thereof. It is pertinent to see that there is no direct representation to the people within the jurisdiction of the Planning Area upon the Planning and Development Authority whose composition under sub-section 3 of section 20 of the Act shows that, except the Chairman who is appointed by the Government and the Town Planning Officer also appointed by the Government to be its Member Secretary, its other members are representatives of the local authorities concerned and the experts appointed by the Government.

Sub-section 3 of section 20 of the Act is as under:. Perusal of sub-section 5 of section 20 of the Act shows that instead of appointing a separate Planning and Development Authority, the Government can in consultation with the Board appoint any local authority itself as the Planning and Development Authority for the area comprised within the local limits of the jurisdiction of such local authority and for such other contiguous or adjacent area or areas as the Government may declare as a planning area under section 18 1 of the Act.

According to section 21 of the Act the term of office and conditions of service of the Chairman and the member of the Planning and Development Authority are as prescribed and the relevant rules framed for the said purpose are known as Goa, Daman and Diu Town and Country Planning Planning and Development Authority , Rules, for short the P.

This place has really gone down hill... - Suvin Kitchen

Suffice it to say that sub-rule 1 of Rule 3 of the aforesaid Rules prescribes the tenure of the office of the Chairman and members of the authority as 2 years from the date of the Notification of their appointment and sub-rule 5 thereof provides for an honorarium of Rs. To understand the functions and powers of the Planning and Development Authority, section 22 of the Act which deals with the same is reproduced below.

Subject to the provisions of this Act and the rules framed there under and subject to any directions which the Government may give, the functions of every Planning and Development Authority shall be Section 26 of the Act deals with the preparation of map and register for which the procedure is provided under section 27 of the Act. The procedure under section 27 of the Act shows that the Planning and Development Authority has to publish a public notice stating that a map and register of present land use has been prepared by it and inviting objections in writing from any person with respect to the same, within the period mentioned in the Notice.

After such objections are received, the Town Planning Officer of the Planning and Development Authority or a Committee appointed for that purpose has to give an opportunity of being heard in person to those who have sent their objections as provided in sub-section 3 of section 27 of the Act. After the report upon the objections is received, the Planning and Development Authority has to consider under sub-section 4 , the said report and it can make such modifications in the map or register or both as it considers proper and adopt the map and the register by means of a resolution.

After the adoption of the map and Register, the Planning and Development Authority is required to publish a Notice of the adoption of the map and Register as provided in sub-section 5 and has also to submit copies of the same to the Board and the Government, in the prescribed form. If the Planning and Development Authority fails to prepare the map and register within six months from the date of its consultation or appointment as provided under section 26 of the Act, the Government is empowered under section 28 of the Act to get such Map and register prepared through the Chief Town Planner, who is an officer appointed by the Government under section 3 of the Act.

It is, however, material to see that as provided in sub-section 2 of section 28 of the Act, the Chief Town Planner has to submit the map and register, after its preparation, to the Board which for the purpose of adopting the map and register so prepared has to follow the procedure and exercise the power of the Planning and Development Authority specified in section 27 of the Act. As regards the preparation of the Outline Development Plan, such plan has to be prepared by the Planning and Development Authority not later than one year from the date of its constitution or appointment, as the case may be as provided in section 29 of the Act.

Its contents are given in section 38 of the Act. Similarly, a comprehensive Development Plan has to be prepared by the Planning and Development Authority not later than three years from the date of its constitution or appointment as the case may be as required under section 31 of the Act. The contents of such Comprehensive Development Plan are given in section 32 of the Act. It is clear from section 29 to 31 of the Act that the Planning and Development Authority is required to submit the Outline Development Plan and the Comprehensive Development Plan to the State Government, after it is prepared.

If the Development Plan, whether Outline Development Plan or Comprehensive Development Plan, is not prepared by the Planning and Development Authority, within the specified period, it is open to the Government to get it prepared through the Chief Town Planner, who after its preparation has to submit it to the Board as provided in section 33 of the Act.

The Board, thereafter is required to follow the same procedure and exercise the same power as the Planning and Development Authority would follow or exercise under the Act. The said procedure which the Planning and Development Authority has to follow and the power which it exercise in preparation of the Development Plan are given in sections 34 to 37 of the Act.

The Development Plan, which is prepared either by the Planning and Development Authority or by the Board in accordance with section 33 of the Act, is required to be submitted to the Government whose consent is necessary for the publication of the Notice of preparation of the Development Plan as provided in section 34 of the Act. The Government can grant its consent to the Development Plan with or without modifications. Sub-section 1 of section 35 of the Act then provides that after such consent is granted to the publication of the Development Plan with or without modifications by the Government, the Planning and Development Authority has to publish the same by issuing a Notification and also in one or more local newspapers as prescribed therein.

By the said publication, it is required to invite objections in writing to the Development Plan within such periods as may be specified in the Notice. The said Notification is treated as a notification duly made under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, by virtue of sub-section 2 of section 35 of the Act. The objections received under sub-section 1 of section 35 of the Act are required to be considered by the Committee consisting of the Town Planning Officer and not more than two of its other Members as provided in sub-section 3 of section 35 of the Act.

Sub-section 5 of section 35 of the Act requires the said committee to give an opportunity of being heard to all persons including the representatives of the Government Department and the local authorities, who have raised objections to the Development Plan and have a made a request for being so heard. After the receipt of the report of the committee, as per sub-section 6 of section 35 of the Act; the Planning and Development Authority can make any alterations, modifications in the Development Plan in the light of the report of the committee.

It has to then submit the Development Plan with or without alternatives or modifications together with the report of the committee to the Board and to the Government. Section 36 of the Act confers the power upon the Government to grant approval in consultation with the board, to the Development Plan submitted by the Planning and Development Authority with or without modifications. It can also return the Development Plan to the Planning and Development Authority to alter to modify it or to prepare afresh plan in accordance with its directions.

Section 37 1 of the Act provides for coming into operation of the Development Plan, which has been approved by the Government by requiring its immediate publication in the notification by the Planning and Development Authority and also in one or more local news papers indicating therein the place at places where copies of the Development Plan can be inspected. Section 37 2 of the Act treats such publication by notification of the approved Development Plan as a declaration duly made under section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, Section 41 of the Act provides that, any land required, reserved and designated in a development is then deemed to be land needed for a public purpose within the meaning of the Land Acquisition Act , and can be acquired thereunder.

Suvin K. Varkey, Co-founder, LogicManse

Section 38 of the Act provides for an appeal against any provisions contained in the Development Plan to the District Court by any person aggrieved by such provisions. The District Court is empowered to quash the Development Plan or any provisions contained therein. Section 39 of the Act provides for alternation of the Development Plan and making minor changes therein as may be considered necessary by the Planning and Development Authority or as may be directed by the board and the Government and the Planning and Development Authority has to, after consultation with the local authorities concerned, follow the same procedure as laid down under sections 34 to 38 of the Act for preparation of the Development Plan for alternations or additions.

Chapter VII deals with the actual development activity and the use of the land within the jurisdiction of the Planning and Development Authority. According to section 42 of the Act the land use has to confirm to the Development Plan. Section 43 of the Act requires that any person who wants to make any development in respect of, or change of use of any land should pay the development charge for the same to the Planning and Development Authority as leviable under section of the Act and further he cannot undertake any such work without obtaining the permission of the Planning and Development Authority in accordance with the provisions of section 44 of the Act.

Section 44 of the Act empowers the Planning and Development Authority to grant such permission for any development work in respect of, or change of use of, any land subject to such conditions as it may deem fit. If any person is aggrieved by an order passed under section 44 or omitted to be passed under section 44 of the Act by the Planning and Development Authority, he can prefer an appeal against the same to the Board which after hearing him can grant permission conditionally or unconditionally as the case may be. As per section 46 of the Act, the permission granted under the Act is valid for 3 years.

Section 47 of the Act requires the Government to acquire the land, if the notice to that affect is given by the person to whom the permission for development is refused. Section 50 of the Act enable the Planning and Development Authority to revoke of modify the permission granted by it for development of the land. The other provisions of this Chapter deal with removal or stopping of illegal development made by any person within the jurisdiction of the Planning and Development Authority. Section 55 of the Act enables the Planning and Development Authority to carry on development activity, pending preparation of the Development Plan having regard to the provisions which in its opinion would be required to be include in such Plan for securing the proper planning of the concerned area.

After preparation of the Draft Town Planning Scheme section 58 of the Act requires the consent of the Government to the draft scheme which is to be submitted within the time prescribed. Before granting its consent, the State Government can ask the Planning and Development Authority to make such modifications in the Town Planning Scheme as it may require it to make. Section 59 of the Act then provides for publication of the Draft Scheme by notification in the Gazette and also in the local newspapers and inviting objections in writing from any person with respect to the draft scheme within such period as may be specified.

Section 60 of the Act enumerates the contents of the draft scheme.

Comments ()

If the Planning and Development Authority does not prepare the Draft Town Planning Scheme, the Government can compel it to do as provided in section 63 of the Act, failing which as provided in sub-section 2 of the said section, it can appoint an Officer to do so. The claim about the disputed ownership of the land for the purposes of the draft Scheme can be gone into and decided by any officer appointed by the Government as provided in section 65 of the Act. Section 66 of the Act provides for an urgency clause to take the possession of the land from the owner forth with for the works included in the Draft Scheme.

Section 67 of the Act then provides that, if majority of the owners in the area for which the Draft Scheme is framed make a representation that the said scheme should be withdrawn, the Planning and Development Authority has to forward the said representation to the Government which can after making such enquiry as it may deem fit direct that the said Town Planning Draft Scheme should be withdrawn and upon such withdrawal no further proceedings can be taken in regard to such draft scheme. Sub-section 1 of section 68 of the Act requires that the Planning and Development Authority should consider the objections received by it to the Draft Scheme within one month from the date of the publication of the Draft Scheme.

It can modify the draft scheme in the light of the objections received by it before submitting it to the Government. The Planning and Development Authority has to submit the Draft Scheme to the Government for its sanction within four months from the date of its publication as provided under sub-section 2 section 68 of the Act.

Sub-section 3 of section 68 of the Act then shows that after receiving the same and making such enquiry as it may deem fit, the Government in consultation with the Board, by notification, within six months from the date of receipt of the draft scheme is required to either sanction such scheme with or without modifications or to return the same to the Planning and Development Authority for preparing a fresh draft scheme in accordance with its directions.

The publication by notification of the sanction of the final scheme is treated as a declaration duly made under section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, If such a scheme is sanctioned by the Government, it shall be deemed to be a final town Planning Scheme as provided in sub-section 4 of section 68 of the Act of which a public notice through the local newspapers is required to be given thereunder by the Planning and Development Authority.

As provided in sub-section 5 of section 68 of the Act, the final scheme comes into operation from the date specified in the public notice published under sub-section 4 of section 68 of the Act. It has effect as if it were enacted in the Act by virtue of sub-section 7 of section 68 of the Act.

The effect of the final scheme as provided in section 69 of the Act is that on the date the final scheme comes into force all lands required by the Planning and Development Authority, unless otherwise determined in such scheme, vests absolutely in the Planning and Development Authority free from all encumbrances and the person in occupation of such land can summarily be evicted by the Planning Development Authority as provided in sub-section 2 of section 69 of the Act.

Sub-section 1 of section 70 of the Act empowers the Planning and Development Authority to decide certain matters in relation to Town Planning Scheme and section 71 provides for an appeal to the Chief Town Planner in regard to certain matters arising from clauses a , b , c , n and o of sub-section 1 of section 70 of the Act. As regards the matters contained in the remaining clauses, of section 70 1 of the Act, an appeal is provided under section 71 2 of the Act to a Tribunal constituted under section 72 of the Act.

Sub-section 1 of section 81 of the Act provides for variation in the scheme on the ground of error, defect or irregularity or informality in regard to which the draft variation proposed by the Planning and Development Authority has to be sent to the Government through the Chief Town Planner and if it is not substantial the Government has to publish the same in the prescribed manner as provided in section 81 2 of the Act.

• Western Anti-Communism and the Interdoc Network: Cold War Internationale (Palgrave Macmillan Transnational History Series)?
• .
• Meet the Creeper.
• .
• ?
• .

Any person effected by this variation is entitled to take objections to it in writing to the Government through the Chief Town Planner with a copy to the Planning and Development Authority as provided under sub-section 5 of section 81 of the Act, within the prescribed period. The Government has to then decide after consultation with the Chief Town Planner and the Planning and Development Authority whether to approve the variation with or without modifications or refuse to make the variation as provided in sub-section 6 of section 81 of the Act.

Notwithstanding anything contained in section 81 of the Act, section 82 1 of the Act provides that a town planning scheme can be varied and revoked at any time by the subsequent scheme made, published and sanctioned in accordance with the provisions of the Act. Section 82 2 of the Act empowers also the Government to revoke the Town Planning Scheme after making such enquiry as it may deem fit and after giving the Planning and Development Authority an opportunity of being heard and after consulting the Chief Town Planner. Section 84 of the Act enables the two or more Planning Development Authorities to constitute a Joint Town Planning Authority with the approval of the Government for preparing a joint Town Planning Scheme in respect of contiguous areas.

The maximum and minimum development charges and the classification on the basis of which they are to be fixed has to be determined by the rules framed under the Act as provided in section of the Act. Section of the Act enables the Planning and Development Authority to levy a development charge upon the development work or the change of user of the land within the area of its jurisdiction for which its permission is necessary under section 44 of the Act. Such Development charge has however to be levied thereunder with the previous sanction of the Government by issuing a notification in that regard and it has to be within the maximum and minimum development charges fixed under the rules.

Section 1 in Chapter-X of the Act provides for a separate fund constituted for the Planning and Development Authority containing the moneys received by the said authority under the various heads shown thereunder. Sub-section 2 of section then provides for the application of the said fund towards the expenses which may incurred by the Planning and Development Authority upon the matters enumerated therein.

Section of the Act provides for the control of the Government over the Planning and Development Authority which has to comply with the directions as may be issued by it from time to time for the efficient administration of the Act. Section of the Act empowers the government to supercede the Planning and Development Authority, if in its opinion it commits default in exercise of the power or the performance of the duties imposed upon it under the Act in its place, an Administrator can be appointed by the Government.

Section of the Act provides for dissolution of the Planning and Development Authority, where the government is satisfied that the purpose for which the Planning Development Authority, where the Government is satisfied that the purpose for which the Planning Development Authority was established under the Act has been substantially achieved so as to render the continued existence of the Planning and Development Authority unnecessary.

Such a Planning and Development Authority stands dissolved with effect from the date as may be specified by the Government in the notification issued to dissolve it. It is in the context of the above provisions and the Scheme of the Act and the Rule framed thereunder that the contentions raised by the parties need to be considered in the instant Writ Petition.

Since the legal contentions raise the question whether the Planning and Development Authorities and the inhabitants within their jurisdiction are effected by or are interested in the question of amalgamation of the Planning and Development Authority as provided in sub-section 3 of section 18 of the Act and therefore, whether it is necessary that they should be heard or at least allowed to raise objections to such amalgamation before any action is taken thereunder by the Government under Sub-section 3 of section 18 of the Act, we propose to consider the said question first before actually dealing with the legal contentions raised on behalf of the petitioner involving the said question.

The learned Counsel for the petitioner Writ Petition No. As such, it is urged that the action in regard to amalgamation of the S. It is also urged on behalf of the Petitioner in Writ Petition No. As regards the Writ Petition No. In particular, the learned Counsel for the petitioner therein has submitted before us that the SPDA had jurisdiction over large planning areas and had collected funds through development charges from the inhabitants in the said areas who had applied for development on their land or change in user of the land and therefore they should have been heard because the amalgamation of the planning areas within the jurisdiction of the SPDA would involve the application of its funds including the Development charges recovered from them, after amalgamation, upon the planning area which was before amalgamation within the jurisdiction of the Planning and Development Authority, Penda.

The learned Advocate General appearing for the State has urged before us that there is amalgamation of Planning areas only under section 18 3 of the Act and therefore no individual can be said to be personally affected by the action taken by the Government under sub-section 3 of section 18 of the Act. He has urged before us that the question of amalgamation of two or more planning areas or sub Division of a Planning area under section 18 3 of the Act is in the realm of the policy decision of the State Government, in regard to which there is no necessity or requirement of compliance with the principles of natural justice.

He has further urged that the legislature in its wisdom has made express provisions in the Act about giving an opportunity to the person including the Planning and Development Authority interested in or affected by the action taken by the appropriate authority under the Act and therefore, according to him, the Scheme of the Act itself thus shows that in taking the action of amalgamation of two or more planning areas or of sub-divisions of a planning area since any person including the planning and Development Authority could not be said to be actually affected by or interested in the said action which was a policy decision of the Government.

In support of his contention, the learned Counsel for the petitioner has urged that when any area is to be declared as a planning area for the purposes of the Act for the first time, the Government is clearly acting on a clean slate and therefore it is not disputed in this writ petition that there is any question of complying with the principles of natural justice or inviting objections of the public before determining an area to be planning area for the purposes of the Act.

However, according to the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the question for giving hearing to the Planning and Development authority or authorities and inviting objections from the public arises at the state of issuing a notification of amalgamation of two planning areas into one or sub division of the planning area into different areas because then the Planning and Development Authorities are constituted and have done some work and are carrying out their activities within the planning areas under their jurisdiction involving also the people is their area or areas particularly when they seek permission for Development or change of user of their lands on payment of Development charge to the Planning and Development Authorities.

The question thus is because there is a Planning and Development Authority constituted and because it has some work upon the planning area within its jurisdiction involving the people in that planning area whether it is necessary to observe principles of natural justice by giving an opportunity of being heard to the Planning and Development Authority and the people from the Planning area within its jurisdiction. In considering the above question it is first necessary to emphasise that under sub-section 3 of section 18 of the Act what is contemplated is amalgamation of two or more Planning areas into one Planning area or sub-division of a Planning area into two different Planning areas and not the amalgamation or sub-division of any planning and Development Authorities or Authority as such.

What is next necessary to be seen is that the Act is itself applicable to a Planning area as envisaged by sub-section 1 of section 18 of the Act. It is, therefore, clear that the determination of Planning area whether for the first time or later on by amalgamation or sub-division is policy decision of the Government taken with a view to efficient application of the provisions of the Act to such area so as to effectuate its purpose of proper and planned development and use of rural and urban land.

In this regard he has urged that the Act has taken care to enact express provisions for consultation with Board and for inviting objections from the persons who are affected by such matters. He has drawn our attention to section 18 5 of the Act in which according to him after taking the decision under section 18 3 of the Act to amalgamate the planning areas or to sub divide a planning area, when the question comes of framing a scheme for determination or apportionment of the fund, assets and liabilities of the Planning and Development Authority or the Authorities concerned prior consultation with them alongwith the consultation with the Board is provided for.

Suvin Virendra Banker, DO | Baylor Scott & White Health

He has also drawn our attention to section 19 2 of the Act in which when any planning area is withdrawn from the operation, of the Act, the Government is required to consult, the Planning and Development Authority concerned along with the Board and the local authority before framing a scheme in relation to the fund, properties and the liabilities of the Planning and Development Authority concerned.

The learned Advocate General has then brought to our notice section 81 6 of the Act which has provided consultation with the Planning and Development Authority along with the Chief Town Planner before approving the variation in the Town Planning Scheme proposed on account of error, irregularity or informality in the said scheme as framed. Similarly, he has brought to our notice section 82 2 of the Act which requires the Government to give an opportunity to the Planning and Development Authority of being heard and also to consult the Chief Town Planner before revoking a Town Planning Scheme in force within the jurisdiction of the said Planning and Development Authority.

The submission thus is that in matters of fund, property and liabilities of the Planning and Development Authority and in relation to the town Planning Scheme framed by it, the Planning and Development Authority is vitally interested and therefore it is consulted or given an opportunity of being heard in such matters. Section 13 1 of the Act, hereinbefore referred to provides for inviting objections from the public to the regional plan and section 13 2 provides for their consideration by the Board in the light of which the Chief Town Planner can revise the said Plan before submitting it for approval of the Government.

The comments from the public are thereafter sent to the Government also which before granting its approval to the regional plan under section 14 of the Act can consider the same and make suitable modifications to the plan, if necessary in the light of the same. As regards the preparation of the map and Register showing present land use, section 27 3 of the Act requires the Planning and Development Authority to invite objections to the map and register for land use prepared by it by giving a public notice for the said purpose. What is important to be seen in that the Town Planning Officer or the committee appointed by the Planning and Development Authority for the purpose has to give reasonable opportunity of being heard to the persons who have sent their objections and to make a report to the Planning and Development Authority which can in the light of the said report, make modifications in the map and the Register.

Section 28 of the Act requires the Board to follow the above procedure when the Government directs the Chief Town Planner to prepare the map and register in default of the Planning and Development Authority doing so with in the specified period. Section 35 1 of the Act also requires the Planning and Development Authority to invite by public notice, objections in writing from the public to the Development Plan prepared by it which includes by its definitions both the plans i.

After the objections are received within the specified time, the Planning and Development Authority is required to appoint a Committee for considering the objections from the public as provided in section 35 3 of the Act which Committee then has to give reasonable opportunity of being heard to the persons including the representatives of the State Government Departments or local authorities who have submitted their objections and who have made a request to be heard in person.

The Planning and Development Authority can make modifications in the Development Plan in the light of the report of the above committee as provided in section 35 6 of the Act before submitting the Development Plan to the Board and the State Government. The same procedure is required to be followed by the Board, if on failure of the planning and Development Authority to prepare the Development Plan within the specified period, the State Government directs the Chief Town Planner to prepare the Development Plan within the specified period, the State Government directs the Chief Town Planner to prepare the Development Plan as provided in section 35 of the Act.

Similarly for making alterations in the Development Plan which has come into operation, section 39 2 requires the procedure under section 34 to 38 to be followed. Even as regard minor changes which are in public interest they are required to be notified to the public as provided in section 39 3 of the Act. Lastly as regards the town planning Scheme required to be prepared by the Planning and Development Authority under section 56 of the Act or in its default by the Officer appointed for the said purpose by the government as provided in section 63 of the Act, section 59 requires the objections to be invited to the Draft Scheme in writing from the persons affected thereby as provided in section 68 1 of the Act and the Planning and Development Authority or the Officer appointed by the Government to prepare the town Planning Scheme in default of the Planning and Development Authority has to consider the said objections in the light of which it is open to them to modify the scheme before submitting it to the Government for its sanction.

It is also material to see that a town planning scheme can be withdrawn as provided in section 67 of the Act, if the majority of the owners in that area make a representation to that effect. Section 81 5 of the Act allows the person affected by any proposed variation in the scheme which variation is not substantial as contemplated by section 81 2 of the Act to raise his objections to the same. It appears from the above provisions of the Act that in matters where the Planning and Development Authority is interested or is affected, the legislature has provided consultation with it or has afforded to it an opportunity or being heard.

Similarly in matters where any persons are affected the legislature has given them an opportunity to raise objections and an opportunity of being heard in regard to their objections. There is therefore great force in the submission made by the learned Advocate General that the legislative scheme provides an intrinsic evidence that in the matter of amalgamation of two or more planning areas into the planning area or sub division of a planning area into different planning areas under section 18 3 of the Act, the Planning and Development Authorities concerned exercising jurisdiction over the said planning areas and the persons residing in the said planning areas are not affected by such act of amalgamation or sub-division.

As already pointed out, the deteringation of a planning area for the purposes of the Act, whether for the first time under section 18 1 of the Act or whether by the process of amalgamation of two or more planning areas into one or by sub division of a planning area into different planning areas under section 18 3 of the Act is a matter of the policy decision of the State Government in that regard, taken purely from the point of view the planned Development of the area in question depending upon the factors such as administrative convenience, size, compactness or geographical integrity of the area or other considerations having bearing on the question of the planned development.

In this regard it is difficult to see how the Planning and Development Authorities concerned or the residents in the planning areas or area in question are involved or are affected. As regards the Planning and Development Authority, it is pertinent to see that it is only when the planning area is declared for the purpose of the Act, that the Planning and Development Authority comes into picture as it is thereafter that it is constituted under section 20 1 of the Act for carrying out the planning activities over the planning area or areas within its jurisdiction.

Similarly, the residents of the State or any areas in the State can have interest and can have affected by the preparation of plans and schemes for development and the work of development or change of user of their lands in the planning areas or area which are questions not germans to the question of determination of the extent of area which should be declared as a planning area for the purposes of the Act.

It is pertinent to see that the Planning has social as well as economic objectives as observed by Lawis Keepal in his book "Principles of Town and Country Planning" which is also clear from the legislative entry No. In view of the population explosion and the haphazard growth and development of cities and towns, it became necessary to exercise effective control over the proper utilization of the land within the State.

The object of planning over an area or areas is to facilitate proper planning of such area or areas having common physical, social and economic problems so that certain matters such as distribution of population and industries roads and highways, preservation of good agricultural lands, reservation of green belts and areas of natural reserves such as natural scenery, trees, woodlands, lakes, streams, rivers and good land-scapes etc.

Proper planning thus involves the proper utilisation of the land and the natural resources is the area and to provide proper amenities, services and utilities in that area.

Been to Suvin Kitchen? Share your experiences!

It is this planning point of view which is borne in mind when the government determines or alters a planning are for the purpose of the Act. This is a Hidden Gem for sure! It even gave my favorite place back home in Florida a run for it's money! They serve a cup of coconut soup before the meal that brings you the comfort of a warm hug! Own or manage this property? Claim your listing for free to respond to reviews, update your profile and much more. All of your saved places can be found here in My Trips. Log in to get trip updates and message other travelers.

Log in Join Recently viewed Bookings Inbox. This place has really gone down hill Review of Suvin Kitchen. Ranked of Restaurants in Hattiesburg. Reviewed December 30, This place has really gone down hill over time. Ask Chonce about Suvin Kitchen. Write a Review Reviews 9. See what travelers are saying: Reviewed November 16, Ask deej about Suvin Kitchen. Reviewed August 18, via mobile.

Ask Julia S about Suvin Kitchen. Reviewed July 10, via mobile. Ask garyc about Suvin Kitchen. All of them need care, attention and extremely talented teachers to take support and take care of their development. From a perspective of Autism, there are a handful of NGO's that address the needs of what to do with individuals with Autism after they become 16 years of age. I want to support this NGO which is doing something truly unique and also the special educators here. This crowdfunding campaign is my initiative, from a teacher to a teacher.

Given below are cost estimates for the first 24 months of the initiative amounting to INR 40L approx. We would be thrilled if the number exceeds INR 40 L. Foreign funding is accepted. These tax breaks are only for Indian citizens.

1. Frameworks for Monetary Stability: Policy Issues and Country Experiences: Policy Issues and Country Experiences, Papers Presented at the 6th Seminar on Control Banking.
2. Travelers who viewed Suvin Kitchen also viewed.
3. About Elephants (About Series Book 1).
4. Jamie, Cowboy Gangbang (Behind Closed Doors - Lust, Sex, Love?);
5. Meditations for Pain Recovery.
6. Suvina B. Redkar vs Government Of Goa And Ors. on 2 August, ?
7. The Slides?

They share a common passion of improving the lives of children and families affected by Autism. Autistic kids are first sent to Bubbles Centre for Autism till they reach the age years and then, sent to Pragati for skill-based vocational training. Bubbles Centre for Autism is a unit of Biswa Gouri Charitable Trust which provides educational programs for children with learning difficulties.

The centre focusses on working with children in the Autism Spectrum and other neuro developmental disorders. This constitutes as school education for the kids who then graduate to Pragati. Pragati, a new initiative of the Biswa Gowri Charitable Trust is skill-based vocational training institute that aims at expanding horizons for individuals with Autism. It works out of a rented space where kids are trained on aspects of Computer technology, block printing, Bakery and Housekeeping.

Their curriculum is designed keeping in mind the complexities of Autism and the things they can and can't do!