The Regulation on the Handling of Medical Accidents. Equity and Public Health Care in China. Seidler - - Journal of Medical Ethics 5 2: Medical Ethics in the German Democratic Republic. Ernst Luther - - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 3: Richard Wu - - Legal Ethics 12 1: Henry Rosemont - - Educational Theory 19 4: Xinwen Wu - - Business Ethics Quarterly 9 3: Supervisor—Subordinate Guanxi and Trust in Supervisor: Environmental Values in the People's Republic of China.

Harris - - Environmental Values 13 2: It is also a fact that none of the great moral teachers of our world ever invented a morality of their own. It is of course the case that moral codes, although objective, are tailored to, or tailored by, the particular culture and age into which they are incarnated. For instance, it has never been the case as far as we know in any culture, at any time, that a man even the chief can take whichever woman he wants to be his wife. In Britain today she has to be over sixteen, and in other countries her age may be higher or lower.

We can no more invent a subjective morality than we can invent a new primary colour. We can no more come up with a novel morality which is in no way connected to an objective morality than we can come up with a new way of breathing.

Next Question of the Month

Evaluating morality in light of this, we face two components that pose a potential threat to moral objectivity: For instance, when the Conquistadors arrived in South America at the beginning of the Sixteenth Century, they were shocked at various rituals of human sacrifice practiced by the Incas.

Those rituals were morally wrong to the Spanish, who had been brought up with the morals of another culture on a different continent. The vast majority of people in South America today will likely agree that human sacrifice is wrong, so we can see that accepted morality has strongly depended on time and place. However, with the increasing interconnectedness among mankind through the internet and especially social media, I suppose that the spatial component will get lost some day.

We may see this in vegetarianism and veganism. Although both diets existed in ancient times, there had never been a spread of those ideas as remarkable as in these times of hashtags, blogs and the international exchange of bits within milliseconds. Furthermore, although a high number of people are still being treated unethically, we also must acknowledge that we have come to a more or less internationally congruent understanding of a morally correct treatment of people.

How objective should we rate this development? On the one hand, we have never been closer to an objective in terms of a universally acceptable morality. On the other hand, we need to ask ourselves whether the temporal component may still pose a threat. Therefore, morality cannot be seen as objective, but perhaps rather as developing towards a set of globally shared morals. That is, moral claims are true or false about aspects of human interaction that involve the ideas of rights and obligations.

Further, the fundamental moral maxims apply universally, and reasonable people can agree on their truth. There are really just two alternatives to moral objectivism: But all the rest lead to absurdity: However, as a social animal I must interact with others. Thus, I find myself in the dilemma of having to act but not knowing how to act. Any theory that leads to this absurd state of mind must be rejected.


  • Et au nom des enfants encore à naître: La nuit démasque (French Edition).
  • Is Morality Objective?!
  • Bound for the Promised Land: Part II: The Sentiments of A Woman.
  • Dr. Pigmys House Of Blood.
  • Moral Flux | D.L. Morrese.
  • Imagine What I Could Do To You;
  • D.L. Morrese.

Moral relativism then is the only credible challenge to moral objectivism. The case for moral relativism is that different societies have different moral judgments.


  • Similar books and articles.
  • Ecological Flux and Traditional Religion | BioScience | Oxford Academic.
  • Alchemy (The Mercian Trilogy).
  • Author of lighthearted science Fiction.
  • Le Livre des Étoiles (Tome 1) - Qadehar le Sorcier (French Edition).
  • Hide! Hide!?
  • Energy Speaks.

However, most more complex moral judgments are derived from a few basic ones, with components that vary with the material conditions of different societies. But the fact that different societies make different moral judgments does not prove relativism. To prove their position, relativists must dig down to the fundamental moral judgments in every society, and then show that these judgments are not shared by societies. This they have not done. This is the indirect case for moral objectivism.

The direct case includes the following ideas: Ethics first; meta-ethics [that is, thinking about the foundations of ethics] second. Meta-ethics should not be an obstacle to the pragmatic project of seeking guidance for human social interaction grounded on something we can all agree on, which I believe is a common human nature. I should like to reformulate the question as follows: Can we demonstrate that any moral claim is objectively true?

Heraclitus (fl. c. 500 B.C.E.)

Not surprisingly, its meaning is highly contested. The economist and philosopher Amartya Sen has described two central features of objectivity: In effect, Sen meant here that objectivity requires both careful observation and inter-observer corroboration. After all, it is much easier to get two people to agree on what smoke looks like than on what an immoral or evil act looks like. For example, suppose the thief was penniless, starving and had no other recourse.

It appears there is no objective means of adjudicating the matter. For MacIntyre, there are objective standards of virtue found within a tradition, such as the ethical traditions of ancient Athens. For MacIntyre, in a given society, the moral code is based on what is agreed to be the shared end of the society and the best way to achieve it, which also gives each member their proper role in the society and their own proper tasks. Thus, in a society one of whose shared aims is the protection of private property, it would be objectively wrong to steal a loaf of bread, all other things being equal.

So, morality itself may not be objective, but for people who share a worldview expressed by the community, morality has context and a shared meaning. You are ugly and grossly overweight. Consider how you feel after reading that. Keep that feeling to hand for the moment. A wrong has been committed, a moral law has been broken.

An encyclopedia of philosophy articles written by professional philosophers.

Instead, the hurt feelings in the insulted person make the offence fairly objective. I need the correct tool, a Geiger Counter, to do that. There were not a lot of typos, but there were a few. Posted in Book Reviews , Science Fiction.

Download options

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Skip to navigation Skip to main content Skip to primary sidebar Skip to secondary sidebar Skip to footer D. Morrese Author of lighthearted science Fiction. Post was not sent - check your email addresses!

Is Morality Objective? | Issue | Philosophy Now

Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.