spenderkinder

On 28 January this year the German Federal Court of Justice decided in a landmark court case that donor conceived people have the right to access the identity of their donor - independent of the offspring's age. Since , there have been several court cases whose outcomes indicated that children have a right to access their genetic origin. And in , a German higher court granted this right explicitly to a young woman conceived by donor insemination for the first time.

In January this year, the Federal Court of Justice confirmed this right and, unexpectedly, also ruled that the right to access the donor's identity is independent of the age of the child. In this most recent court case, the parents of two children aged 12 and 17, appealed to the Court of Justice after the clinic refused to provide the donor's identity. At the time of treatment, the parents had signed a document with the clinic indicating they had no interest in the donor's identity. However, as the children grew older, they wanted to retrieve this information.

Introduction

The clinic did not provide the donor's identity as they had granted the donor anonymity unless a court decision overruled this. The parents therefore appealed to the State Court in Hannover, which rejected the appeal saying that disclosure of identity would only be possible after the children turned 16 - the age at which adopted children in Germany can access information on their biological origins.

The parents then took the case to the Federal Court of Justice.

S Stands for...

The subsequent decision of the Court of Justice is a good basis to prepare further legal and logistical changes. At the same time, however, it also indicates the challenges ahead. For example, confusion has already appeared over the effect of the recent ruling on legal paternity. In Germany, although parents cannot contest paternity once they have both agreed to donor insemination, the child can. So far in Germany there has never been a case in which a child has contested the legal paternity of his or her father after donor insemination. And most, if not all, court cases initiated by donor conceived people in other countries have concerned access to the identity of the donor, not the desire for the donor to become a legal parent.

Nevertheless, in media contributions last week, there were several misleading articles indicating, or at least suggesting, that donors now run a greater risk of becoming the legal parent. This is simply not correct as family law has not been changed.


  • theranchhands.com: Spenderkind (German Edition) eBook: Katrin Stehle: Kindle Store;
  • Richard Rex & the Succubus of Whitechapel.
  • Méchant (Littérature Française) (French Edition).
  • Follow the Author.
  • My New Life in Diapers Book 4 - Weekend with Caroline;
  • See a Problem?.

The risk remains the same and no donor recruited through the medical system in Germany has ever become a legal parent. At the same time, sperm donors still do not enjoy full legal protection in Germany. For example, in the case of lesbian parents who are not in a legal relationship and who, therefore, cannot adopt a child conceived through donor insemination, as well as in the case of single mothers, the donor runs the risk of legal paternity with all consequences including visitation rights for the child.

Spenderkind by Katrin Stehle

Donors should enjoy full legal protection independent from the sexual orientation or the civil status of the recipient women. Another issue is that there was no statement by the court regarding the fact that, in the past, donors were ensured anonymity.

This decision raises the question of whether donors will become identifiable even though they donated at a time when doctors typically informed them that they would remain anonymous. This seems tantamount to a retrospective removal of anonymity. Germany is lacking a comprehensive legal framework for donor insemination and, once again, this court decision has only highlighted the challenges this presents. German legislators now have the task to tackle this and to initiate legal changes that respect the rights and needs of every party involved in donor insemination.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions. Syndicate this story - click here to enquire about using this story. Home Articles News Comment Reviews. Archive Current edition Subscribe. Donating time Financial support. Objectives Background Reader testimonials People. Writing articles Writing scheme.

German court decision raises more questions than answers 9 February By Dr Petra Thorn. Appeared in BioNews Court decision in Germany supports rights of the donor conceived to access their donor's identity. German court case may put an end to a sperm donor's anonymity. Sputnik International all editions Log in Register Log out. Swipe Right for Sperm: Track Do not track Community standards Discussion.

Katrin Stehle

Comment via Facebook Comment via Sputnik. Your comment will be reviewed by the moderator for compliance with the Rules.


  • Germany – Spenderkinder.
  • German court removes age limit for sperm donor disclosure.
  • MAUDIT (Estrange Reality t. 2) (French Edition);
  • Paperback.

Please try again in a minute. All comments Show more comments News Latest Most Read Trump Foundation Fizzles Out.

Leaked: Germany’s Plan for Sperm Bank Database May Help Thousands Find Dad

Please type the code. Log in Privacy Policy. I agree to the processing of my personal data for the purpose of creating a personal account on this site, in compliance with the Privacy Policy. Please confirm your e-mail to continue. Confirmation instructions have been sent to.

Blogging rules

Instructions to recover your password have been sent to. Do you have a Sputniknews. Register Forgot your password? I agree to the processing of my personal data for the purpose of creating a personal account on this site using social media plugins, in compliance with the Privacy Policy.