Although the few brief skirmishes during the Rebellions of are historically of little significance in and of themselves, these rebellions played a huge part in Canada becoming the country it is today. Because of the unrest Lord Durham was sent from Britain to see what could be done. He was willing to listen to the grievances of the common people and as a result men of all social classes received a vote, not just the wealthy land owners. This book does contain reference to prayers and church, but it is in more of a cultural sense than a sense of true belief in something.
- Staubsauger und andere Monster (Kurzgeschichten) (German Edition).
- Wisdom of the Toga: Mythic Patterns That Shape Our Lives.
- Navigation menu.
- Account Options;
- Piano Concerto No. 21 in C Major (Elvira Madigan), Movement 1 (K467) - Full Score!
- See a Problem?.
Teacher Application As a supplementary resource to study the rebellions of this is a wonderful choice, however as a stand alone resource to teach this history the book falls short. It fails to thoroughly explain the larger social issues of the day. It is important that the teacher emphasize the unfair treatment the poverty stricken people were receiving. The government was controlled by the wealthy landowners. The situation was very similar to what went on prior to the American revolution in the United States.
Luckily, England chose to send Lord Durham to determine if the complaints of the people were justified. He set about reforming the political system to give the common people a voice. If students have studied World or American history, it would be very interesting to have them write a paper about what they think would have happened if Lord Durham never came to create social change. There is a historical note at the end of the book that builds upon the history introduced in the story.
Initially Deborah lies to her family to keep Daniel safe. Feb 21, Damaris Tonner rated it really liked it. This was one of my favourite books in Grade 7 and Grade 8, and I still pick it up and read it again and again from time to time. What a wonderful perspective of the War of , from a Canadian viewpoint!
A Question of Loyalty
The characters and romance are convincing, but not too sappy for young readers. This is a must-read for young, avid history fans. I would suggest every Canadian homeschooler should read this one. I really loved the premise of this book. The style was alright, and it was really clean.
I did like her parents.
But there were a few things that bugged me: Deborah has been raised to hate people like Dan, then suddenly she feels more loyalty to him then her family. I didn't really get how that worked. Deborah pretty much thinks the world should revolve around herself. This was a realistic feeling, but highly annoying to I really loved the premise of this book. This was a realistic feeling, but highly annoying to read.
She's upset when Dan actually wants to leave Ya know, just so he won't get killed. Deborah gets mad when Dan doesn't want to get her killed by doing something stupid.
She gets upset when her dad wont let her stay in the house alone with Dan because it would be improper. This list could just keep going. Deborah wears pants at one point for no real reason and she gives a little speech about how much more comfortable they were then skirts. I've worn skirts all my life, and the first time I wore pants I was going rock climbing I was incredibly uncomfortable.
I get really tired of all these books having this speech in them. Overall, I really did not enjoy this book due to the fact that the negative factors outweighed any good it had. Jan 18, Sam rated it liked it Shelves: Despite very prominently emulating the ambiance of the rebel-heavy olden days, A Question of Loyalty is far too tedious to succeed at its goals and fails to provide much of a gripping drama--drowning out most of the novel's characterization in the process.
I had to read it for school, so I didn't get to enjoy it as much as I would if I read it on my free time! Doing work is always a downer. Angela rated it it was amazing Nov 07, Sammani Kitulwatte rated it it was amazing Jun 30, Nicole rated it it was amazing Nov 12, Xan rated it really liked it Jun 25, Vanessa rated it it was ok Dec 07, TV Episodes I have seen.
Share this Rating Title: A Question of Loyalty 06 Apr 8. Use the HTML below. You must be a registered user to use the IMDb rating plugin. Edit Cast Episode complete credited cast: James Hacker Nigel Hawthorne Sir Humphrey Appleby Derek Fowlds Bernard Woolley Judy Parfitt Betty Oldham Nigel Stock Sir Mark Spencer John Pennington Peter - Civil Servant Rosemary Williams Civil Servant Anthony Dawes Committee Chairman John Rolfe Edit Did You Know?
It occurred before certain important facts were known, and couldn't happen again. Well, that Hitler wanted to conquer Europe. I thought that everybody knew that.
About the Author
Not the Foreign Office. Sir Humphrey therefore lists to him the sort of excuses they need to come up with: Hacker is then told that the Prime Minister has taken an interest, and his special advisor, Sir Mark Spencer, has asked to see him. Hacker meets Sir Mark at 10 Downing Street. The PM is apparently concerned that despite his pledge to cut expenditure across all departments, not one of them has managed to do so, for the simple reason that all the ministers have "gone native", i. In the course of the conversation, Sir Mark indicates that he and the PM are trying to get through to the MPs that the government, although committed to cutting expenditure, has been thwarted by the civil service and that it was they who supplied the evidence to Rhodes and Betty Oldham.
Hacker's attempts to come up with excuses for the Select Committee has only served to damage their efforts.
A Question of Loyalty - Barbara Greenwood - Google Книги
Sir Mark points out that Sir Humphrey has described his minister in glowing terms — which amounts to him being a failure. Hacker is also told that his only course is "absolute loyalty", although to whom is up to him As he and Sir Humphrey sit before the Committee, Hacker surprises his Permanent Secretary by going further than their prepared answers and states that Rhodes, the author of the book containing the allegations, has agreed to head an independent inquiry into government waste, starting with their department.
Betty Oldham questions the Minister's loyalty, but he tells her that his allegiance is to Parliament and the nation. He says he is determined to enact reforms, and that Sir Humphrey is his "staunchest ally", with which the civil servant reluctantly concurs. Later, Sir Humphrey is exasperated at his Minister's performance and warns him that the PM will be unhappy at his "public admission of failure". However, a letter arrives from Number 10, inviting Hacker and his family to lunch at Chequers at the weekend.
Hacker notices that it is handwritten, and asks Sir Humphrey if he knows the value of such a letter, to which Sir Humphrey replies, "I believe the going rate is thirty pieces of silver. Sir Mark Spencer is the Prime Minister's political advisor.