Wir arbeiten hinter den Kulissen mit Hochdruck an einem weiteren Stretchgoal. Aber die Zeit ist sehr knapp, und eventuell schaffen wir es nicht mehr bevor die Kampagne zu Ende geht. Und vielleicht ist es auch kompletter Quatsch. Wir machen diesen Freitag, I would love to see you guys working closely with some of the food startups; e.
End grain is higher quality since it allows the blade to slip between the woods natural fibers. This prevents your blades from dulling AND it allows the woods to "heal" itself from very small cuts when the blade leaves by pushing the grains back together. Which means fewer microscopic slots for bacteria to grow and unsightly scoring on your bored. Think of it as one of those rubber arts and crafts mats for exacto knives that reseal slots created by blades. YES to end grain!
That would make this board perfect! I don't mind paying extra for it to increase the life span of the board! Ich mag das Board und die Ideen dahinter sehr. I like endgrain design. Is it more durable of a board or just better for blades? Plain Wood if no really reeeaaal greeeeennn edible glue! Sind solche Events eventuell nochmal in naher Zukunft geplant? Thanks for the offering. I'd like to take a oak, maple or walnut endgrain.
But walnut would be my preferred. Share this project Done. Much more than just a cutting board: The Frankfurter Brett is a new way of cooking. Missed our official campaign? Click below to place your pre-order anyway: Knife cutting thorugh horizontal wood fibres, right knife with endgrain woodfibres: Luke Sorcelli , S. Delzer , and 16 more people like this update. Comments Only backers can post comments. Arvydas on December 9, I would like that!
Wolf Horlacher on December 9, Endgrain?
Update #3: Last week madness | stretchgoals? | Meet us @ Manufactum | Giftcards
Bryan Lovely on December 9, Yes please to endgrain, especially in maple. Adam Schneider on December 8, I would be interested in an end grain option. Tracey Oshiro on December 7, Yes I would be interested in the endgrain option. Kristy j on December 7, Yes to end grain! Vicki Welborn on December 6, Yes please end grain!
Download This eBook
What is the legal basis for drug prohibition? Within the parameters of the U. Misuse of Drugs Act [equivalent to the U. Controlled Substances Act] the issue is ostensibly based around the idea of harm. We have an Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, which is a group of scientists in different realms that the government consults when a drug is going to be scheduled or reclassified.
The council then carries out a wholesale review of the substance and makes a recommendation for or against prohibition or reclassification. There has been a trend though where the government will ask the Advisory Council to carry out such a review and then just completely ignore their results and do what they want to do. What results have they been ignoring? There was an extensive U. That study showed that alcohol is the overall forerunner in terms of harm, and tobacco comes close after that. A lot of the Class A drugs [equivalent to Schedule I in the US] and psychedelic drugs in particular were at the opposite end of that scale showing very low risk of harm.
Did the government refute the study or did they ignore it? They basically ignored it. In relation to the alcohol and tobacco findings, obviously nobody has called for their prohibition. An alcohol user can alter their consciousness freely despite the proven risks while a psychedelic user faces heavy punishment. Is that an admission that the harm-based justification for prohibition no longer applies? Basically, and it goes beyond that. We have a recently elected Conservative government in the U.
- The Space Hotel (Tom Swift, Young Inventor).
- Ma Semaine Russe (French Edition).
- Il paradiso dei diavoli (Italian Edition);
Any substance that alters your emotional state or mental functioning. It openly states that we [the government] think we have the right to stop you from altering your psychological state. I assume there are exemptions for alcohol, tobacco, and caffeine. Yes, for culturally accepted substances. This legislation is potentially so broad that prior to its enactment the government felt compelled to write to bishops to reassure them that the incense used in church services would not become illegal, despite its being mildly psychoactive.
What does that kind of blanket ban indicate to you in terms of legislative intent? The tradition in English law was always to intervene as little as possible. That concept has been dying in more recent years. This violates classic liberalism, where you have the concept of limitations of power, as most famously espoused by legal theorist John Stuart Mill. How much power can the state legitimately hold over the individual? Mill laid down the principle as prevention of harm to others.
Paternalism in terms of protecting people from themselves? Even if you could make a case for that kind of paternalism, how can imprisonment possibly be for our own good? In the majority of cases, the primary and often only harm being suffered by the individual is due to the punishment imposed rather than from the substance use itself. How do you intend to build a human-rights case against drug prohibition? There are different ways in which you can approach it. Article 8 [in the European Convention on Human Rights] guarantees the right to privacy.
In Mexico, there was a Supreme Court ruling that for individuals to grow and use cannabis was a human right connected to the right to privacy. Here in the U. I think that is a really promising development. The suggestion is that drug use should be a private choice?
The vast majority of police stops and searches in our streets are for drugs rather than anything else, which is an obvious violation of privacy. Read more broadly, the right to privacy equates with our ability to become who we want to be. Mill, again, was a strong proponent of experiments in living as an important means for self-discovery.
It seems like there are stronger laws in place to prevent a patient from being medicated against their will than there are permitting self-medication. How similar are those two concepts? I think you have to be very careful about how you construct your argument. It's about an abuse of state powers. Medical arguments have broadly relaxed prohibition of marijuana in this country. Do you see that extending further? I do, but I also think that the medical model is problematic in its own right.
I think we need more of a holistic definition of health. We should be talking about allowing individuals to flourish, to develop beyond basic well-being. Besides the right to privacy, what other rights do you see influencing the legitimacy of prohibition? Article 9 guarantees religious freedom, so, basically, if you consider the drug you use to be a sacrament, then banning it is a form of religious persecution.
In the States, you have a more doctrinal approach to what constitutes a religion. Is there a holy book and a central belief system? We have this loose interpretation of what religious belief is. It can even cover atheism, for example. Indeed, any belief system of significance to you can potentially be covered. The court tends to accept that, but then they say that your ability to manifest that religious belief—for example by drinking ayahuasca—has to be balanced against the public interest in you not doing it.
Taking your example, can you talk about why someone would want to use ayahuasca? There have been a lot of studies, and the overall conclusion seem to be that the long-term psychological well-being of people who use it is actually higher than control groups who have never used it. It has thousands of years of cultural history behind it. Then, of course you have the anecdotal evidence of many individuals saying that using ayahuasca has been a very beneficial and transformative experience.
A lot of people seem to think that the religious argument has the best chance of succeeding here in the U. It has already been successful in the U. Courts have allowed exemptions in certain cases with ayahuasca, and with the Native American Church and peyote. There have been similar rulings in other countries—Holland and Chile, for example, but nothing like that here in the U. Interestingly, in the U. The prosecution has raised the fact that exemptions are against international law and the judiciary has said that it doesn't trump religious freedom.
If religious freedom is weaker in the U. More broadly under Article 9 is the right to freedom of thought, which is closely linked to freedom of speech, given that our thoughts precede our speech. These substances, as precursors, allow you to think in entirely different ways—which can be beneficial.
In the absence of that, it is impossible that say that this is truly a free society. Viel stand auf dem Spiel. Das Risiko hat sich ausgezahlt. Die Wissenschaftler waren in der Lage, bei Patienten, die unheilbar erkrankt sind, die Angst vor dem Sterben mit einer einzigen Dosis Psilocybin drastisch zu reduzieren. Wie kann ich mir einen Verteidigungsfall bei einem Drogendelikt vorstellen, der sich auf die Menschenrechte bezieht?
Historisch gesehen sind Verteidigungen die sich auf die therapeutische Behandlung oder auf die Religionsfreiheit beziehen davon ausgenommen. Welche Ergebnisse hat die Regierung ignoriert? Hat die Regierung diese Studie widerlegt oder sie ignoriert? Im Wesentlichen hat die Regierung sie ignoriert. Ich glaube nicht, dass es legitim ist zu sagen: Es ist erstaunlich, dass dieser Gesetzestext in keiner Weise auf das Konzept von Schaden eingeht.
Wie definiert die britische Regierung psychoaktiv genau? Jegliche Substanz die emotionalen oder kognitiven Funktionen beeinflussen. Es ist seltsam das eine Regierung glaubt dazu ein Recht zu haben. Was impliziert dieses Generalverbot in Bezug auf die legislativen Absichten der Regierung? Dieses Konzept stirbt die letzten Jahre vermehrt aus und wird ersetzt durch die Annahme, dass man etwas nicht machen kann bis es die Regierung explizit erlaubt.
Wie beabsichtigen Sie einen Fall gegen das generelle Drogenverbot basierend auf Menschenrechten aufzubauen? Das ist das erste Mal das offizielle Quellen sich auf ein Menschenrecht-basierendes Argument beziehen. Ich glaube, das ist eine vielversprechende Entwicklung.
Der Vorschlag hier ist, dass Drogengebrauch eine private Entscheidung sein soll? Es sollte eine private Wahl sein, solange es anderen nicht schadet. Menschen die dies nicht haben sehen oft keinen. Ich denke man muss aufpassen, wie man sein Argument aufbaut. Es geht um Freiheit und den Missbrauch von Macht seitens der Regierung.
- Similar Books.
- E Book For Free Download American Melodrama Pdf Pdb 0933826206.
- trio sonata op 5 no 6 1st movement preludio largo for two violins and continuo Manual?
- Danny Elfmans Batman: A Film Score Guide (Film Score Guides);
- Enjoying Later Life (Making a Difference Book 1)!
Sehen Sie eine Erweiterung auf andere Bereiche? Ja, aber das medizinische Modell bringt seine eigene Problematik mit sich. Ich glaube wir brauchen eine holistische Definition von Gesundheit. Im Moment sprechen wir nur davon, dass kein Mentales oder physiologisches Krankheitsbild vorhanden ist. In den Vereinigten Staaten ist das Konzept von Religion dogmatischer. Es gibt einen Test, der feststellt, ob eine Religion ein heiliges Buch und ein zentrales Glaubenssystem hat. Es gibt eine ganze Liste, die abgearbeitet werden kann. In Europa gibt es das nicht.
⚡ Latest Ebooks The Templars Penance Mobi | Website To Download Ebook.
Es kann zum Beispiel Atheismus beinhalten. Die Argumentation dreht sich im Kreis und macht den ganzen Prozess bedeutungslos. Es ist seit tausenden von Jahren in menschlicher Kultur verankert. Aus dieser Perspektive ist die Idee, dass wir erlaubt sein sollten, zu denken was wir wollen.
You can request verification for native languages by completing a simple application that takes only a couple of minutes. Review native language verification applications submitted by your peers. Reviewing applications can be fun and only takes a few minutes. Galway City, Galway, Ireland Local time: About me Experience I was born in Germany and grew up bilingual.
I worked for various companies in Europe as well as Southeast Asia and was never satisfied with the approach of interpersonal communication nor the numerous development limitations of working in corporate. I used this experience to understand my needs better but also to see where I can excel. My hunger for healthy social interactions as well as my drive for perfection led me to become a consultant and freelancer who collaborates on all ventures with my spouse.
I attended Maastricht University, where I have specialised in neuropsychology with a focus on clinical diagnosis, anamnesis, and psychopharmacology. My tertiary education, paired with my work experience, as well as my bilingual ability provides me with a technical understanding of my work; this combined skillset, matched with my passion for languages but also the aptitude for finding patterns and mistakes allows me to work with a broad range of topics.
Approach My capability to deal with people, that my spouse lacks, make me the face of our venture. I have the required patience and skill to make our customers feel loved and can, at the same time, set comprehensible boundaries for those who are socially inept; this prevents losses but also creates a healthy work environment for all parties. I am organised and systematic; I do this to save my time as well as the clients. I am flexible, adjust to new situations quickly, and welcome a challenge.
I exercise a direct and polite communication style as well as a strict, no-nonsense policy. I have developed a level of empathy that allows me to understand each parties standpoint, even if I do not agree. I am emotionally stable and require my environment to be the same. I intend to form long-term work relationships that serve everyone involved equally.
About us We are spouses who studied linguistics and neuropsychology. Each of us has identified their specific skillsets, but we also learned that pooling our resources leads to improved results; we applied the same methodology to our postgraduate studies and continued this trend in our ventures as consultants and freelancers. Our most significant advantage is working as a team, as well as the ability to think critically and make decisions based on our analysis. Both of us are notorious problem solvers that focus on fixing issues; for this, we develop workflows that allow us to create results which satisfy even our picky minds.
Our approach and processes are under continuous evaluation. We do not shy away from telling each other if our work is not meeting our standards and needs refinement. It is our passion for concise and error-free text, as well as the ability to take ownership of our work, that drive us to perfection. We have specialised in proofing the source for grammatical and factual errors; this in-depth understanding of the text allows us to create concise translations by using language that is easy to understand and free of errors.
🌟 Mobile Books Download Einfach Erfolgreicher Mit Businesshealing German Edition Pdf
Our approach to work as linguists is evidence-based. We know that language is elaborate, ever-evolving, and depends on context; this allows us to craft complex content that is easy to approach while maintaining a natural flow. Frequently Asked Questions Are you an agency?
We are a married couple that works together.
Amazon Free Downloads Ebooks Coup De Grace Sarah Deane Mysteries Ibook By J S Borthwick
What makes you different? We are not concerned with others; we concentrate on what we do best! When did you start working freelance? What services do you provide?
We work as linguists who translate, edit, proofread, and localise. We also work as consultants who assist companies in understanding as well as improving internal and intercultural communication. What are your language pairs? We work from German to English as well as English to German.
What type of projects do you cover and what is your availability? We mostly take on projects which we can complete within a week. We also work on larger projects that span over several weeks or months. What do you charge? Our remuneration depends on the quality and content of the source, the time we have to complete the project, as well as the payment terms. What CAT tools do you use? We use Memsource for all of our projects. With its integration of term bases and translation memories, it allows us to ensure consistency as well as improved and measurable quality but also permits us to collaborate on projects in real-time.
How do you define quality? Establishing if something is of quality can only be done by comparing it to something else; a person who knows the rules, and has long-term exposure to the subject matter, might also provide a valid statement on quality. One must understand the rules to break them. How do you control for quality? We developed a tried and tested workflow of research, translation, editing, proofreading, as well as quality assurance that is under continuous scrutiny for improvements.