National Branding

Differentiation is more effective when it comes to food, architecture and culture," branding guru Wally Olins advised Executive Forum participants. Ensure that key public and private sector entities dealing with tourism, investment and export development convey the core message in their marketing programmes. Once the core idea has been developed, modulate it for each priority audience.

Create a visual idea, which you can also put into words. The words should encapsulate what the concept stands for in different circumstances.

The bizarre scheme to transform a remote island into the new Dubai | Atossa Araxia Abrahamian

Do not let the government run it. Create a structure that is going to be there when the government changes. Ensure that the brand is promoted among local audiences as an asset and protect its credibility through establishing and managing standards for usage. Scholer, ITC coordinator ; D. Walvis, Stardust Ventures, the Netherlands. Natalie Domeisen was part of the group that coordinated national branding research for the Executive Forum, and moderated the regional Executive Forum debate in South Africa.

Few 'branding' models Very few countries have successfully launched a national brand. Sectors suited to national branding Tourism, and eco-tourism in particular, are the obvious associations made with national branding. Marketing your identity Two points stand out from the research papers, discussions and debate: First, countries must be sure they understand how they are perceived abroad.

They need to invest in researching external perceptions of their national traits and products. Otherwise the promotional campaigns will fall flat. Second, national characteristics selected for promotion must have a basis in business reality. ITC has researched and compiled what it believes are cases of 'best practice' in determining whether countries should consider brand development, and how they go about it.

Managing an existing brand is equally challenging. Among the many case studies presented, Scotland the Brand is useful for its attention to sound research, quality assurance, financial sustainability, communications strategies and public-private partnership approach. But strategy-makers should be clear: Then Alex asked him what there was to see in Lipetsk. The city of Lipetsk, half a million people clustered in the middle of an infinitude of farmland, is a dour, half-hearted place. The famous fountains of Verkhniy Park are indeed splendid, but Nizhniy Park, nearby, is patched with weeds.

For a small city, Lipetsk conveys a sense of sprawl — of large vacant and unlit spaces right within its urban limits. Just outside the city, a stone column announces the date of its foundation: In the absence of anything else, the steel mill seems to hold the region together. Lipetsk Oblast, the regional administrative unit, was created by fiat in , when chunks of five other oblasts were glued into one. At their most casual, they resemble unusually diligent tourists. In Lipetsk Oblast, the team visited half a dozen towns in as many days, where they sought out both the well-known — the sky-blue, golden-domed cathedral in Zadonsk — and the unknown — in Chaplygin, a cheese-making workshop; in Yelets, a museum in the house of the Soviet composer Tikhon Khrennikov; in the middle of nowhere, a small falcon reserve.

They never missed a museum. They ate carefully, selecting restaurants and dishes with local flavours. They photographed statues and town squares and graffiti. Their attentions were ready to squeeze the juices of cultural meaning out of everything they saw, lending them the air of semioticians on holiday.

They scanned Lipetsk with intent: The woman was a member of the staff at the Lipetsk airport; it had been 15 seconds since we got off our plane. The days were filled with conversation. The Grands set up interviews that can run for hours. They talked to government officials, of course, but they also met historians, museum curators, restaurateurs, photographers and artists.

One evening, they spent 30 minutes talking to a woman who made lace. Another afternoon, the team dropped into the Lipetsk State Technical University, where a class of 15 students spoke about their region and how they wanted, by and large, to leave. At the university, Alex popped a series of word-association questions. If your city were a car, what kind of car would it be?

If it were a man, what kind of job would he have? Lipetsk proved tough going. A local historian admitted it: The Grands discovered that in , when the Scorpions came here on tour , they played to a feeble audience; most people skipped the gig, thinking it was a cover band, sure that the real Scorpions would absolutely never come to Lipetsk.

The Grands expanded this meagre vision. They reached into the period of the Bulgar kings, who ruled this region between the seventh and 13th centuries, and distilled a set of attitudes and values that had persisted into modern-day Tatarstan. The people were perfectionists, the Grands decided. They honed their skills and craftsmanship continuously, they were competitive, and valued pragmatism; they also bore a sense of loss about their past, and they prized the material over the spiritual or the intangible. Schools and universities folded these cues into their syllabuses; architects based blueprints on them.

In their annual reports, government officials took to naming sections after the values the campaign celebrated.

• A Certain Destiny.
• How to sell a country: the booming business of nation branding!
• .
• How to sell a country: the booming business of nation branding | News | The Guardian?
• Affaires personnelles (Littérature Française) (French Edition)?
• The Wishing King.
• How to sell a country: the booming business of nation branding.

The tourism sector, which was never encouraged as warmly as industry, received a dose of state enthusiasm: For the Grands, Tatarstan showed what their work on identity could do: The two communities have been like oil and water, an official told Alex Grand — tolerant but rarely mixing. But an uneasiness had crept in.

The year the campaign began, a series of arson attacks targeted churches across the region. One young imam confided to Instid that he was worried about radicalisation — about how local preachers were going to the Middle East and returning with a sterner style of Islam. It was the most ambitious form of national myth-making, and the riskiest: Fiascos show themselves quickly, though.

Citizens may not feel a connection to a campaign, or may even rebel against it. Even so, The Hague is the rare case where a strategy gained its limited objective, and that was possible because the city worked with its already strong image. In the late s, Anholt used to frame place brands in the way advertiser or a corporate marketer would. He once told the New York Times: Anholt visited Mexico several times, and much as the Grands did in Lipetsk, he interviewed historians, filmmakers, journalists and academics.

Mexico suffered from a malaise of low self-esteem, he concluded. Countries need to fix the way they run if their reputation is to shift. A well-regarded country, Anholt thinks, does as much for humanity at large as for its own people. Sweden is currently first, although some of the metrics lend themselves to argument. Restless preoccupations with national identity or ties to the land have often been prologues to periods of oppression; if a country keeps defining how people belong, it also defines how people do not belong.

The direction in which nation branding work tends to flow is problematic as well.

Navigation menu

Agencies in New York, Madrid, London and Paris dispense advice to governments in Asia, Africa, eastern Europe and Latin America on how best to present themselves — a configuration that can veer easily into cultural imperialism. The concept of measuring global perceptions of countries across several dimensions culture, governance, people, exports, tourism, investment and immigration was developed by Simon Anholt.

His original survey, the Anholt Nation Brands Index, was launched in and fielded four times a year. Today it is fielded and published once a year in partnership with GfK , named the Anholt-GfK Nation Brands Index, using a panel of 20, people in 20 countries to monitor the global perceptions of countries. Brand Finance produces an annual Brand Finance Nation Brands table, in which brands are ranked according to national brand value. This is based on the royalty relief methodology and takes into account the brand strength of individual countries.

Futurebrand tests a global research sample based on the Hierarchical Decision Model HDM which involves determining an individual's awareness, familiarity, association, and preference towards a country's brand. In their ranking, the top 5 nations brands were ranked from first to fifth Germany, Switzerland, Japan, Sweden, and Canada.

Monocle magazine released its third annual Soft Power Survey in From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Diplomacy in a Globalizing World: New Public Diplomacy in the 21st Century A comparative study of policy and practice. Archived from the original on November 6, Lists of countries by political rankings. Bribes Corruption barometer Corruption perceptions. Composite Index of National Capability.