You can collect several media for one order in the shopping basket. The maximum order quantity for each medium is: Schaeffler applies cookies to secure an optimal use.
Utility Navigation - New
With the further use of this website you accept the application of cookies. English Deutsch Contact Schaeffler International. Company The Schaeffler Group is actively helping to shape the rapid developments that are taking place worldwide as part of mobility for tomorrow. Development opportunities Work-life balance Leadership essentials. Investor Relations Megatrends and future markets — what are the best investment strategies? Overview Products X-life - Measurably Better. Are you sure If you click on "Delete all" all the items are removed from the cart.
Your ZIP file is created! There are no items in your Media Basket. When it comes to taxes, there is a widespread popular belief that we all agree on one thing: The feeling was much the same among early Canadians, as we learn from reading Tax, Order, and Good Government: A New Political History of Canada, The book, by Elsbeth A. Note that this volume forms a tandem with Give and Take: The Citizen-Taxpayer and the Rise of Canadian Democracy by Shirley Tillotson, which covers the period beginning with the introduction of income tax in Among other things, Heaman proposes stepping back from the romantic notion of political history as a group of men sitting around a table making decisions, and including the broader public debate on the question of what people deserved.
- Derniers numéros;
- Wandering;
- Dangereuses fiançailles - Une mère à protéger - Une femme traquée (Harlequin Black Rose) (French Edition)!
- The New Jim Crow.
- Schaeffler Group | News & Media | Social News.
In her bid to educate the general public on the issue of Canadian taxation, the author and her team trawled through large quantities of documents from municipal, provincial and federal archives in various offices across the country. During this information-gathering exercise, she came across a message from an A.
Goldstein beseeching the tax collector of the City of Montreal to waive payment of his municipal water tax bill. In the note, dated , Mr. Goldstein reveals that his family had faced numerous trials and tribulations in the preceding months and that, in his mind, insisting on payment of the bill would be tantamount to condemning him and his family to death. Struck by the urgency of this plea, Heaman inquired into the rights that such a person held at the time.
She sees only one way to kill off the firmly entrenched popular belief alluded to earlier: Heaman is associate professor of history and classical studies, and the current director of the McGill Institute for the Study of Canada. Her book Tax, Order, and Good Government: All were celebrated criminals who captured the popular imagination in 19th- and 20th-century Quebec. Having already garnered four awards since its publication in , the book has now won a Canada Prize in the Humanities and Social Sciences.
Seeking to determine what holds a society together, Alex Gagnon found that people tend to rally around negative rather than positive elements. Gagnon feels that the best way to understand a society is to identify what is cast out into a sort of moral ostracism.
theranchhands.com: Etienne Hirsch: Books, Biography, Blogs, Audiobooks, Kindle
The manner in which certain crimes take root in collective memory is largely dependent on modern means of communication and mass media, starting in the 18th century and gathering strength in the 19th. Although the popular imagination is generally placed in the category of abstract phenomena with no concrete existence, a study of celebrated crimes reveals that, on the contrary, it plays a fundamental role in history. No society can exist without imagination.
The imaginary is what lends meaning to the world around us, which is something very concrete. Although the popular imagination of societies continues to be fed by various crimes, and in so doing indicates where society's new boundaries lie, the phenomenon varies over time. Congress coincides with the 40th anniversary of the founding of SSHRC, and we are excited to contribute some excellent events to its program. Our Storytellers contest will once again bring the next generation of talented students to the event to showcase how social sciences and humanities research is affecting our lives, our world and our future for the better.
Heaman for her book Tax, Order, and Good Government: The Canada Prizes are awarded annually to books in the humanities and social sciences that make an exceptional contribution to scholarship, are engagingly written, and enrich the social, cultural and intellectual life of Canada. Heaman , Tax, Order, and Good Government: In Tax, Order and Good Government: A New Political History of Canada, , Elsbeth Heaman provides a path-breaking history of Canadian taxation from Confederation up until the introduction of the progressive income tax.
All Canadians interested in the history and growth of the nation will want to read this meticulously researched and captivating analysis. The ceremony will take place in Riddell Centre - RC This is a Congress blog about event Click here to find out more about it. In recent weeks, the governments of the U. This diplomatic rebuke has come in response to the poisoning of a former Russian double agent on British soil, a crime the U.
Add to this the on-going fallout from Russian interference into the American election, and it seems that relations between Russia and the West have hit their lowest point since the end of the Cold War. Do these events suggest the dawn of the Cold War 2. What are the prospects for liberal democracy in such a world? What can be done to protect and revive the democratic project both within the West and around the world? Renowned scholar of international relations, Oxford University Professor, and Regina native Jennifer Welsh will address these and other questions during her keynote address The Decline of the West , at Congress Professor Welsh delivered the CBC Massey Lectures, which were subsequently published as The Return of History, a book that examines crises such as regional wars, the plight of refugees, and rising social inequality, all of which threaten the stability of the international order.
Her analysis is a sober reminder that democratic values and institutions cannot be taken for granted; rather, they must be defended and renewed by each subsequent generation. The University of Regina is honoured that Professor Welsh will be delivering this talk at Congress , on May 30 at The event is sponsored by the Faculty of Arts, and is free and open to the public.
For more details, please click here. The social sciences and humanities must lead the way in engaging and learning from different perspectives to respond to this question. For Congress , the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council SSHRC has gathered a panel of leading international scholars to explore strengthening Indigenous research and research training through a global lens. Join us for an afternoon of stimulating discussion! A linguistic anthropologist and native speaker of Chatino, her research aims to empower native speakers to study and teach their own languages. A leading scholar of race and whiteness theory, she is an executive member of the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Higher Education Consortium.
A Journal of Native American Studies. Instrumental in the development of American Indian studies at Arizona State, Riding In is a public figure known for his research and advocacy for repatriation. Her book, Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples , has been an international bestseller since its publication in Guest blog by Glen C. They also told us their monthly ethnocultural vegetable ECV expenditure.
Working with horticulturalists who focused on how to grow those vegetables which we had determined were most popular, we then investigated global ECV value chains, vegetable pricing, and the roles of the dominant corporate food regime and emerging local food movement in meeting this demand. After publishing several journal articles, conducting ECV demand workshops, and being active on social media, we decided to write a book about our work.
Poorer immigrants, for instance, tend to inhabit food deserts where they can access cheaper, unhealthy junk food, but not their cherished, but more expensive, ethnocultural vegetables.
- Navigation.
- Le cerveau humain au cœur d’intenses recherches.
- Crimes Ambientais e bem Jurídico-Penal (Portuguese Edition);
- Le cerveau humain au cœur d’intenses recherches.
- Gergia Ranch.
- Mitt Romney: Revised, Redacted and Retroactive?
- Der Kraft-Mayr (German Edition)?
Too many immigrants are unable to afford ethnocultural vegetable alternatives to their actual preferred ECVs that many corporations promote. There are contradictions between mainstream commercial agriculture and both the temporary foreign workers many superexploit as well as the small, organic ECV growers with whom these commercial farmers compete.
Conflicts also exist between the predominant vegetable growers of European descent and their multi-ethnic wholesale and retail consumers. This book argues that Human Rights Codes should require that people have access to culturally appropriate food, and governments should consider tax incentives for farmers wanting to grow ECV locally.
Interdisciplinary ECV research should be expanded and disseminated. Canadian food sovereignty and our health depend upon it. He has edited and co-authored other books including Intensive Agriculture and Sustainability: Economic Opportunities and Policy Directions for Africa Thankfully, Congress includes plenty of innovative cultural programming that will provide such a break. Ironstar will demonstrate how to do Indigenous beadwork while encouraging participants to contribute to a collaborative art piece. Organized by the First Nations University Regina Cultural Committee, elders and knowledge keepers will discuss medicinal plants of the Southern Saskatchewan prairie and their traditional uses.
For a full listing of Cultural Connections events and times, see the lineup here. The Federation wholeheartedly congratulates Lyne Sauvageau on her election to the presidency of the Association francophone pour le savoir Acfas. The Federation thanks him for the work he has done and for the collaborations he enabled between our respective organizations. Looking ahead, as President of the Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences for the next year, I see many areas in which the Federation and Acfas can work in tandem to advance our shared priorities.
Both of these organizations are committed to:. It is with great enthusiasm that I congratulate Lyne Sauvageau on her appointment. I sincerely look forward to working with Acfas under her stewardship, in finding ways to collaborate on mutual goals, and in successfully advancing our similar agendas. More than ever, universities are expected to produce knowledge that is of tangible benefit to people and communities. This idea is the inspiration behind Community Connections, a series of events held throughout the week of Congress that will touch on a wide range of social issues of local, regional, or global significance.
The events will explore and discuss ways in which the humanities and social science scholarship can contribute to the needs of diverse communities, including Indigenous communities; the Fransaskois community; LGBTQ communities; and immigrant and refugee communities. From an audio tour that explores the experiences of LGBTQ people in Regina, to a workshop on Bringing Higher Education to Prison , to talks on controversial issues in our education system, the series has a lot to offer.
Over the duration of Congress, more than a dozen topics will be explored through the Community Connections series. They are free and open to the public. For specific dates and times, please see our full series lineup here. Patrizia Albanese was acclaimed as President-Elect. Albanese holds a PhD from the University of Toronto. Wesley Crichlow was acclaimed as Director, Equity and Diversity.
His teaching focuses on the challenges to implementing policies and practices that strengthen broader notions of diversity and social justice within educational institutions and organizations across Canada, accounting for the intersections of race, gender, class and LGBTQ2S identities. Crichlow holds a PhD from the University of Toronto. Tim Goddard was acclaimed to a second term as Director, Teaching and Learning. He teaches in the field of educational administration and leadership, with a focus on international development and education in fragile communities.
He is a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada. Martel is a Professor of History at York and a specialist in twentieth-century Canadian history. He has published on nationalism, relations between Quebec and the French-speaking minorities of Canada, public policy and counterculture, moral regulation, deviance, drug use, and RCMP surveillance activities.
The results of the elections were ratified by the Board of Directors at its meeting on March , These results will be approved at the Annual General Meeting on May 27, , after which date the four new Board members will assume their new roles. For more information about the Federation, visit ideas-idees. The Canada Prizes are awarded to books that make an exceptional contribution to scholarship, are engagingly written, and enrich the social, cultural and intellectual life of Canada. The two winners of the Canada Prizes will be announced on April 9, and will be presented at an awards ceremony to be held during the Congress of the Humanities and Social Sciences at the University of Regina.
The right one is about debates in the field and gaps in the literature, and it presupposes what you eventually discovered. I find the wrong one is usually more interesting. The story behind my latest book, Getting a Life: I wore a belt buckle made from an old Nintendo Entertainment System controller, and the compliments it garnered from my fellow comics aficionados came as no surprise.
What did surprise me was that I kept receiving appreciative comments after I left the show and went poking around trendy boutiques on Queen Street West. Reflecting on the experience, I thought there might be a research project here — and there was, just not the one I was looking for. But, when I went looking at how the press had talked about geeks and nerds since the late s, I found that they were always in this state of arrival, always just about to have their revenge.
Instead, I started asking who was being left of out the story. When I looked at cultural criticism being published in mainstream media sources, I was told I should care about geek culture because of its broadening popularity, but where did that leave people who had been involved with it for years, even decades? I hung out in comic book and game stores, conventions and fan club meetings, spoke with the people who ran them, and interviewed participants representing a range of different communities within geek culture about the place they held in their lives.
Getting a Life argues that geek culture is a name for a set of social practices oriented to media such as comic books, games, and cult genres like science-fiction and fantasy. Over the years, media especially whatever media happen to be new media at the time have been blamed for isolating people, replacing active engagement with our neighbours and fellow citizens with a passive relationship with objects. In the spaces of geek culture, however, I found that media also provide the basis for community-making. The various practices of connoisseurship that draw people to the objects of their fandom necessarily put them in relationships with one another, and their shared cultural experiences create a common frame of reference for articulating — and struggling over — the values that are important to them.
Getting a Life is his third book. The Science Review panel report provided a long-term roadmap for building the dynamic research system Canada needs to succeed in the 21st century. Responding to Human Trafficking: It was in these exchanges where my theorizing of the complexities of humanitarian interventions and their muddied relation to self-determination began to take shape. I hope this book will invite a conversation about the possibilities and the harms of anti-violence strategies in a context of settler colonialism and its ongoing, daily lived expressions of violence.
There have been many times I wished I could have sat across from Trisha as I later worked through the theories and ideas that came to shape my work. Her voice will continue to echo through generations of research and resistance. But, even more so, she resounds in relationships of resistance. It was important to me that even the format of the book demonstrate the foundation of relational conversation.
This is also why I was honoured that Dr. Sarah Hunt provided the foreword. In all she does, Sarah exemplifies a dedication to building networks and relations of kindness and inclusion, while fiercely working to dismantle systems of oppression. The book begins from the premise that rights-based interventions are simultaneously a source of resistance and oppression. They hold the capacity to draw attention to the necessity of social change, while also reproducing ongoing conditions of colonial dispossession and restricting efforts to dismantle settler colonialism.
This approach assumes that rights-based discourses emerge through a continuous process of negotiation and interaction between representatives of formal policy and social and moral entrepreneurs, activists, and advocates. Situating anti-trafficking initiatives within ongoing settler colonialism reveals the restricted possibilities for transformative change involving settler societies. This continues to reproduce the systems and structures that humanitarian efforts claim — and oftentimes aim — to be addressing through rights-based mobilization.
She specializes in the areas of colonial gendered violence, community-based research, anti-violence, and critical analysis of law and criminal justice. Kaye engages in CIHR-funded, community-based research with individuals working in sex trade industries, community organizations, and harm reduction agencies in Edmonton and interprovincial explorations of body autonomy and anti-violence strategies funded by SSHRC. She also engages community in researching racialized policing and works alongside families, relations, and grassroots organizers of missing and murdered Indigenous women, girls, trans, and two-spirit MMIWGT2S.
Kaye participates in decolonial, anti-violence organizing and research alongside Indigenous-led responses to violence against Indigenous women. With more than 5, research papers and lectures presented each year, the Congress of the Humanities and Social Sciences is a must-attend event for academics. The winter season is the time of the year when most of the Congress programming is being developed. It is natural that calls for papers are among the most important deadlines of this period.
Given the size of Congress and the diverse audiences that attend the numerous conferences therein, researchers should gear their presentations in language accessible to as many attendees as possible. Some conferences will be open to various audiences, including scholars of other disciplines, media outlets as well as the general public. In order to allow graduate students and recent graduates to participate to Congress, the University of Regina is providing this assistance to offset the costs associated with attending. Graduate students and recent doctoral graduates who meet the requirements will be eligible for a grant that will cover accommodations, food and bookstore costs to attend Congress and present their research.
Most call for papers deadlines are still ahead.
The Federation has prepared a list of associations whose deadlines are still open for the months of December, January and February. If you wish to submit an abstract for an association that has closed their call for papers, please contact the association directly. Registration begins in mid-January on the Congress website and early bird pricing is in place until March Canadian Association of Professional Academic Librarians. Black Canadian Studies Association. Canadian Association for Social Work Education.
Society for Existential and Phenomenological Theory and Culture. Canadian Association of University Teachers of German. Hungarian Studies Association of Canada. Association for Nonprofit and Social Economy Research. Canadian Association of Programs in Public Administration. Canadian Game Studies Association. Canadian Society for the History and Philosophy of Science. Canadian Association for the Advancement of Netherlandic Studies. Canadian Association for the Study of Discourse and Writing.
Association for the Advancement of Scandinavian Studies in Canada. Canadian Society of Medievalists. Canadian Association for Food Studies. Canadian Association for Studies in Co-operation. Canadian Association of Slavists. Canadian Society for the Study of Names. Canadian Association for Work and Labour Studies. Indigenous Literary Studies Association. Graduate students are the lifeblood of universities.
While my department provided me with some funds to make the trip, I covered most of the bill myself. I met peers from across Canada, presented my research to respected scholars, received valuable feedback about my work and explored a new city. For the first time, I saw myself as an academic.
Media release: Canada Prizes double to $10,000 each, and juries announced
Plus, of these awards are for recent grads of a PhD program who have yet to obtain work, which helps people caught between grad school and a secure job. Since taking on the role as President of the Federation, my number one priority has been to build a closer, more collaborative relationship with our members. The organization made a strong commitment to improve member engagement in its Strategic Plan , and it is a commitment I plan to uphold in my tenure over the next 18 months. In my first six months, I have been actively listening and learning about member needs, looking for ways to improve the work we do:.
Together we will succeed because we believe deeply in the potential for humanities and social sciences to contribute meaningfully to fundamental questions about the nature of human agency, the importance of freedom, and the role of education in a flourishing, bilingual and multicultural society. Otto Von Bismark once famously remarked that: I first decided to write On the Side of the Angels: Canada and the United Nations Commission on Human Rights because I wanted to better understand the diplomacy behind international human rights law — the how and why the sausages are made, not just the final outcome or the what.
As a constructive middle power and liberal democracy committed to multilateralism, Canada seemed like an obvious actor — the who — to investigate. I also wanted to understand where the sausages were made. But it was disbanded in and replaced by the UN Human Rights Council because it was deemed no longer fit for purpose.
What I soon found was that Canadian diplomacy at the Commission was complex, calculated, and often nuanced and full of contradictions. But on other issues — economic, social and cultural rights, or the rights of Indigenous peoples — Canadian governments of various stripes stood in the way of progress. In this respect, Canada is no different than any other state. It is an overview of Canadian contributions to international human rights law at the UN. But it is by no means the final word. Rather, it just scratches the surface.
There is so much more that can be done — and needs to be done. If the UN human rights system is ever to fulfill its potential as an effective guardian of universal human rights, we will need to expose the many factors that go into sausage-making, as unappealing as many of them are. He is the author of In Defence of Principles: My starting point is to welcome the recently published Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences report, Approaches to assessing impact in the Humanities and Social Sciences as a valuable addition to a growing policy understanding of the diversity of ways in which humanities and social sciences research HSS creates societal impact.
Both these approaches rely on stylisation and peer review to turn particular exemplary activities into scores allowing comparison between research groups. But despite the widespread understanding of the diversity of ways in which HSS creates societal impact, there remains a persistent concern that HSS researchers have made little, or at least fragmented, progress in achieving societal impacts. One explanation for this phenomenon is organizational: Researchers have neither the time, the training nor the incentives to make achieving impacts a primary goal. And herein lies the problem: At ENRESSH, for example, we found an example of a historical research group studying a country whose popular self-image as an independent nation-state was bound up with a particular conservative-nationalist political current.
Challenging that historical narrative was bound up with challenging that conservative political capital, the impacts of which could be regarded as negative, unpatriotic or worse. But from certain progressive political perspectives, the concept of resilience has become embroiled in a wider political climate in which state responsibilities for welfare are passed back to smaller groups, and therefore abandoning those more vulnerable groups to the market. And just as no ethical medical researcher is going to develop a drug that significantly harms their patients, it is unsurprising that HSS researchers are concerned that promoting impact may lead to their research harming their research subjects or others.
This question clearly needs more serious consideration and resolution of the tensions arising in using research before we will really experience a qualitative improvement in the wider societal benefits created by HSS. About this blog series: It is our hope that this series of blogs and our new report will help support a productive conversation in the HSS community about the important topic of scholarly impact assessment.
Sitting at the Toronto airport, waiting to board my connecting flight to Regina ahead of the Congress planning meetings, I was very excited. Members of the Federation team, the host university team and association organizers meet every fall for very important operational meetings to kick off the planning cycle for the upcoming Congress. It is a very exiting time.
Since I started at the Federation two years ago, the entire team has been very excited about Congress in Regina for a number of reasons. Among these are the facts that the campus is beautiful, and that both the city and the university are excited to host us. Our Congress Registrar, Donna Lelievre, who has been with the Federation over 16 years, recalls that one of the best Congresses she has experienced was in Saskatoon in , and she expects Regina to be just as excellent — if not better.
After experiencing the vast city of Toronto and hitting a record 10, delegates this past May for Congress , we look forward to heading to a prairie city for an entirely different experience. While we were in Regina, we stayed at the beautiful Hotel Saskatchewan downtown, across from Victoria Park.
It was an easily navigable drive to the university, which is just under 10 minutes away. The campus has abundant green space and is covered in trees. Once we arrived on campus for our meetings, we had no trouble orienting ourselves, and by day two, we were pros at finding our way around. Our operational meetings with all the various departments catering, audio-visual, facilities, residences, to name just a few went splendidly. We received a warm welcome across the board, and it was clear to me that everyone at the University of Regina is looking forward to hosting Congress attendees and creating a memorable experience for all.
The programming the university is putting together is diverse and interesting. The Big Thinking lunch hour lecture lineup is now confirmed, so keep an eye on the Congress website for more details. We had the opportunity to check out the residences, too. They are fresh, spacious and modern, as all residence buildings have been built or updated within the last 10 years.
U of R President Dr. Vianne Timmons hosted a lovely reception for the operational departments, association Program Chairs, Local Arrangement Coordinators, city officials, tourism representatives, the Federation team and many more in her beautiful residence in Wascana Park. She certainly set the tone for the kickoff to our planning cycle, conveying her genuine passion for promoting scholarship and a contagious excitement to host Congress During her remarks, she made it clear that Congress was going to be an unmissable, memorable event — and we at the Federation could not agree more.
We will SeeYouInRegina where you will be able to experience much more of the prairies than the glimpse we received during our visit this fall. The prairie hospitality is unique, the campus is beautiful and the programming lineup is exciting. Every September, millions of Canadian students return to campus for a new academic year. In this blog you can read about a variety of conversations happening in the post-secondary education sector this fall. The need to bridge the gap between university and the workplace is being acknowledged as work integrated learning opportunities are increasingly more available to Canadian students.
Tuition costs are top of mind at this time of year. According to Statistics Canada University tuition fees have jumped an average of 3. Many students are going into debt, but research shows that graduates with a post-secondary credential out-perform and out-earn people without, supporting the idea that more education makes you richer.
Statistics Canada data shows that between Canadian enrolment in STEM-related disciplines rose by more than 32 per cent, while enrolment in the humanities and social sciences increased by just less than 17 per cent; nevertheless, graduation rates remain close with a 36 per cent increase in STEM degrees, and a 31 per cent increase in social sciences and humanities.
Institutions across Canada are also altering their programs to integrate skills from both arts and applied disciplines in the curricula science. In Ontario, the provincial government plans to move forward in creating the first stand-alone French-language university , governed by and for francophones — likely in downtown Toronto. And finally, there is much happening as campuses across the country seek to Indigenize their institutions and transform the educational experience.
The concentrated effort to improve and incorporate Indigenous values and education in Canadian institutions can be seen as a response to the calls of action from the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. This includes financial help with tuition, textbooks and living allowance, as well as emotional, cultural and spiritual support by bringing Indigenous culture to the forefront.
Further west, the University of Saskatchewan is looking at making Indigenous content mandatory for all students within the next two years and is calling indigenization one of its highest priorities. Exciting university programming news can also be found in Haida Gwaii, British Columbia this fall with students from across the country taking part in a one semester groundbreaking Reconciliation Studies program.
Offered by the Haida Gwaii Higher Education Society HGHES this program was developed by Indigenous and non-Indigenous contributors who explain that Indigenous realities a huge part of Canada that gets overlooked in Canadian history and are targeting it as the main focus of the new program. One day, the U. The next, he glibly dismisses racial injustice in America by smearing black athletes engaged in peaceful protest. Watching it all is exhausting. How should we react in the face of this relentless volley of ignorance and wrong-headed decisions?
A first step is to look past the constant distraction and refuse to blindly follow the angry bouncing ball. True, Canada needs to respond to the specific threats posed by this presidency, but Canadians must not lose sight of the deeper cause behind these daily crises. It seemed the truth had lost its power to persuade. We have also showcased a highly successful refugee system to the world and advocated for international cooperation in the face of growing isolationism. There remains work to do, however, to support the kind of informed, inclusive public dialogue that will enable Canada to address its biggest challenges and sustain the health of our democracy in the longer run.
Climate change, growing inequalities and reconciliation between Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples are just some of the most obvious issues facing us. Each has deep social and cultural dimensions, and none are likely to be addressed by technological innovation alone.
They require solutions informed by new insights from multiple fields, leading to action in a diverse mix of communities and different sectors of the economy. Scholars in the humanities and social sciences, who create knowledge about the way human systems function, and the way that different people think, behave and interact, will have an essential role to play. Education is a primary defense against the post-truth phenomenon.
We need more people who can think critically about complex topics, differentiate between good information and bad, see past their own biases, and respectfully consider other perspectives, especially when confronted with ethnic, religious or cultural differences. New research is also vital. Scientists and scholars in diverse disciplines provide important evidence that supports informed, fact-based discussion.
This includes not only scholarship in areas such as medicine and engineering, but also in the humanities and social sciences. The Government of Canada is still working on its vision for higher education and research in a post-truth world. Meanwhile, the Trump administration has made its choice, doing its best to cut funding for research and culture, and to shut down the National Endowments for the Humanities and the Arts.
Canada has a responsibility to choose a different path. The Federation is pleased to see that Dr. The Federation had been a strong advocate for this position and submitted numerous recommendations to ensure its effectiveness and autonomy. Since the s, policy makers progressively became interested in assessing scientific research not only on its merits for the scientific community, but also for society at large.
However, we still do not have a widely accepted, systematic way to assess scientific impact. So why is it so difficult to assess impact of research? The main reason is that there are so many different kinds of impact, depending on the societal context. Clearly, this goes for researchers working in, say, medical fields compared to those working in agriculture or ICT. But it goes a fortiori for researchers working in the broad array of humanities and social science HSS fields. Researchers who work in language departments and want to have an impact on the language curriculum of high schools have to deal with legal and governmental departments, with school boards, with student and teacher organisations, with parent groups, with publishers, etc.
A researcher working in the area of, say, religious studies or art history faces a rather different context, filled with refugees, NGOs, politics, etc. Moreover, many of the issues HSS researchers are interested in also attract passionate debate among members of the public. These circumstances make it difficult to develop impact measurements that resemble procedures used for evaluating the scientific quality of research, a system that arguably works the same for all fields of research.
Ergo, a one-size-fits-all approach is possible but see the Metric Tide report for a convincing critique. However, the situation is not hopeless. On both side of the Atlantic, researchers of the science and technology studies community and beyond have been working steadily on approaches to societal impact evaluation. Journals like Research Evaluation or Science and Public Policy regularly report on these developments. A RAND report presents a nice overview of methods for impact evaluation.
And the interesting thing is that many of these efforts have arrived at similar conclusions. One is that societal impact is not a linear thing; rather, is it the result of the productive interactions between researchers and stakeholders. Assessment methods should respect this. Another is that quantitative methods may be good for measuring certain kinds of impact for example economic , but qualitative methods are preferred in many other impact areas changes in politics, or in attitudes, public influence, a new protocol in hospitals, improvements of rules and regulations, organizing work in a different way, a more humane treatment of refugees.
Another is that it makes no sense to ignore the differences in context, and that it is much more productive to ensure that contexts inform the evaluation process. In case of the UK REF and the Netherlands SEP this has led to an emphasis on narratives and case studies, which comes as an advantage for HSS researchers because that is part and parcel of what they do and produce.
And after all, Elliot Eisner was right when he slightly rephrased a famous Einstein quote: Now 42 Canadian universities strong, CIMVHR is the hub for researchers working together in addressing the health research requirements for our military personnel, Veterans and their families.
As an institute that grew from two universities to 42 in a span of seven years, our methods for assessing the impact of what we do have varied. In our early years, we assessed our impact through the growth of our institute. After we had the foundation of our institute in place, we expanded on how we can capture the impact of CIMVHR by incorporating surveys into our assessment process.
While still valuing our impact in numbers, surveys provided us with feedback from not only our researchers, but from the population to whom we dedicate our research. Surveying attendees at our academic events provides us with the information we need to strengthen the research at our future events, which in turn creates better outcomes for our military personnel, Veterans and their families. Our organization has many moving parts that create various deliverables, such as: Each one of these requires a different approach to assess the impact delivered to our stakeholders.
In addition to the previous assessment examples, we found it necessary to incorporate analytics into our process. As a national institute, which recently started working with seven global affiliates, our primary form of communication is web-based social media, website, online open access journal, funding opportunities, etc.
Formulaire de recherche
As result of pursuing these various methods of impact assessment since the inception of CIMVHR, we have been able to show our results and thereby grow and strengthen our institute as the leader in military, Veteran and family health research. Moving forward, we will continue to add new assessment methods to increase our strength and develop new tools to track our impacts. At CIMVHR, we thrive, in a concerted effort with our university members, to influence policies and practices through pluridisciplinary evidence based research.
In this era of the hour news cycle, alternative facts and the proliferation of hard-to-verify sources, the online magazine Salons reminds us that research in the humanities and social sciences plays a key role in helping us analyze and understand society. Salons invites the public to reflect on various societal issues as we read and review various articles published over the years in scholarly journals.
This is a way for the magazine to showcase the abundance and importance of reputable and rigorously developed research. It also demonstrates the value of easy access to this information, as the articles and other resources featured in Salons are freely available to all. Each month between June and June , a well-known researcher and a stakeholder in the cultural or academic fields will provide commentary on a key societal issue.
This analysis will draw on a bibliography of other sources on the issues, as an invitation to the public to explore the articles listed. Salons is a kind of monthly stylistic exercise that will introduce the general public to these resources and show how accessible they are, as well as how relevant and rich. It will examine the question of Canadian identity by looking at 13 themes: Salons advocates the idea that research is a public good and that access to knowledge must be as open as possible.
There are also many links to the databases of various public archives. Browse through issue number 3 of Salons, which explores the role played by Indigenous communities in archaeological research: His aim is probably familiar to many of us in the humanities and social sciences. We take seriously the effects people have on each other, from impressions to words to actions to social institutions to cultural traditions to historical legacies.
This effort is an area of scholarship in its own right, called the scholarship of teaching and learning SoTL. Priorities of the Professoriate , Ernest Boyer proposed a broader explanation for the work that faculty do. Perhaps he used the Intercultural knowledge and competence or Integrative learning rubric. Our colleague, for example, is an expert in the many ways in which stories, beliefs, performances and other artifacts document the experiences of the individuals and communities that produce them.
He is well equipped to bring his expertise to the work of SoTL and just needs the artifacts produced by his students to begin. He is primed to ask how artifacts like regular formative assessments e. He could analyze such artifacts collected during the semester, and perhaps continue to collect relevant artifacts from some of the students throughout their folklore studies program. And what if he continued even well after graduation? Not simple, as most of our scholarship is messy, human stuff.
This is the potential of the scholarship of teaching and learning, a vibrant, multidisciplinary, international field that has much to offer those interested in assessing impacts in the humanities and social sciences. For more information on SoTL, see my online guide at http: He is an acclaimed scholar whose main areas of teaching and research are modern political theory, intellectual history, Canadian constitutional politics, and the theories of federalism and nationalism.
Widely published in Canada and internationally, his current work is focused on the reinterpretation of Canadian federalism. She offered remarks and awarded the Canada Prizes at a ceremony on Sunday, May This was a welcome message to our community, particularly at an event celebrating excellence in humanities and social sciences scholarship. The Canada Prizes recognize and celebrate the exceptional research that scholars in our community are undertaking.
Their passion and dedication are an important part of what allow us as Canadians to better understand who we are — as individuals and as a country. See the full text of her speech here. Social science and humanities researchers provide evidence for sound policy making and train the next generation of critical thinkers These are important priorities for Canada and for the academy itself. Having the insight and perspectives from scholars of diverse backgrounds is crucial not only for justice and fairness, but to mobilize the knowledge and understanding required for an inclusive, democratic and prosperous society.
Inclusion begins with understanding diverse peoples, cultures and social relations, and the humanities and social sciences are an essential part of this process. The Federation looks forward to working with our members and the government to take up this important challenge together.
The Canada Prizes are awarded annually to the best books by Canadian scholars in the humanities and social sciences that make an exceptional contribution to scholarship, are engagingly written, and enrich the social, cultural and intellectual life of Canada. Winners are selected from books that have received funding from the Awards to Scholarly Publications Program, which is administered by the Federation. Read the blog or watch the interview video about his work. Read the blog or watch the interview video about her work.
Congress wrapped up on June 2, and I am still smiling from the success of the event. It was my first Congress so I wanted to share some highlights with you and take a moment to thank all those who participated. It was an incredible week at Ryerson University, with a record-breaking number of attendees: The depth of discussion and exchange of ideas was inspiring, and it left me with a lot to think about in the 12 months before we gather again next year in Regina.
Listen here to an interview about the importance of Congress. Thank you to Ryerson University for hosting this important event and finding innovative ways to introduce Torontonians to the humanities and social sciences. Ryerson University programming included an outdoor tipi installation, an experiential refugee hut, a thought-provoking discussion with Cornell West , a tour around its urban farm, and a truth and reconciliation tour in the streets of Toronto. And these are just some examples of the exciting Ryerson presents…programming I took in.
A major highlight for me was an opportunity to hear The Honourable Kirsty Duncan, Minister of Science, address the Congress community when she attended the Canada Prizes award ceremony on May Watch the video here:. The Big Thinking series featured discussions that were thoughtful and at times difficult.
There were extraordinary discussions around truth and reconciliation. We heard from present and powerful Indigenous women and debated protocols and pedagogies of Indigenous ethics in the classroom. In a session hosted by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council SSHRC , leading scholars emphasized how important it is for Canadians to understand how knowledge within distinct Indigenous traditions is created, honoured and shared.
Among the topics discussed were our national identities and building interdisciplinary approaches to the humanities and social sciences. Toope has been a driving force for Congress and all of the humanities and social sciences. I am personally very grateful for his many contributions to this sector and to this organization. To find out more about what a great host city Regina will be, read this message from Dr.
Thank you to each and every one who was there this year, and I hope to see you at Congress Congress celebrates the vitality and quality of Canadian research contributions and helps train the next generation of Canadian ideas leadership. Follow this series of Big Picture at congressh blogs.
Interviewer Desmond Cole then engaged Monet on race, justice and movement building in North America and around the world. They spoke about language, about its power as a means of cultural making, remaking, and preservation, about how language is as much how you say something as what you say. Speech for Monet is a pathway to freedom: It is also a component of the performance of identity played out on the body, but the language of poetry can express the interior world that the performance of identity obscures. Cole asked Monet questions about her activism with the Dream Defenders and the Smoke Signals Studio, the latter of which she co-founded.
That work took Monet to Palestine, where she met with young Palestinian activists and artists to collaborate on ways to stand up to state violence. Monet said that with corporate culture making nationalist lines of demarcation less and less relevant, oppression has become more and more unified, so we have to be unified across boundaries and borders in order to be free. Monet co-founded the Smoke Signals Studio out of her home, and she spoke about how home for her is the first and most important safe space available to people of colour to start building a free society. For this reason, she called on all of us to do more to foster the imaginations of our children.
It takes more than imagination, however, for Monet to survive and thrive in a world of violence against Black people and systems of White supremacy. When asked how she does it, Monet replied that it is through love—not romantic love but love of all kinds—that keeps her going. Being a lover for Monet is about doing right by yourself and others, making sure that your home is a place of love, and the love of the mundane and the everyday food, housing, friends.
Activism for her is not just about confronting the police and other tools of state violence and oppression: Internationally established poet, performance poet, singer, songwriter, educator, and human rights advocate Aja Monet was interviewed by activist, author, and award-winning freelance journalist Desmond Cole in Black Joy: Two social scientists and one natural scientist working at the intersection of public policy and academic research spoke on the challenges of bridging the gap between academia and policy making in Critical outlook: Marie Clair Brisbois, who began her academic career in the natural sciences and left academia to become an activist before returning to the academy as a social scientist, said that the push for fact-based policy developed using the scientific method is still nebulous.
According to Brisbois, there is still a lack of awareness among policy makers that social sciences can inform the process of how policy is made as well as its content. The culture of bureaucracy in Canada makes it challenging to present science, but social science has the advantage of already looking at the greater context of politics, economics, and society that informs policy. The social sciences interpret information with critical tools and quantitative measures, contributing to a process-oriented system of policy making that maintains relevance over time while retaining knowledge of our past.
Social science also functions as a critical lens for looking at and changing systems and changing policies to account for the particular. Finally, it is important for educating the public and keeping spaces for public discussion and criticism open, active, and vibrant. According to Franks, the humanities are too often relegated to the role of helping scientists or social scientists present their knowledge and findings rather than being allowed to contribute critically themselves.
Donna Kirkwood brought the perspective of a natural scientist to the panel, having worked previously as a scholar, a professor, and now a policy maker all in the field of geology. According to Kirkwood, federal scientists work primarily to provide information of significant public interest in fields such as forestry or natural resources. They provide scientific advice for different public agencies, laws, and regulations. However, the context surrounding science in society is becoming more complex, and federal scientists have to develop new methods in order to keep up.
Kirkwood said that Canada is strong in fundamental research, but weak in developing that research into marketable end products. Science-guided public policy needs to be produced for the public good and needs to be reformed by working together with the social sciences and humanities in a new trend of collaboration within the policy making community.
All of the panelists also agreed that there needs to be more collaboration with the public. Brisbois proposed that we need to start looking at different methods of governance and different knowledge centres in order to account for the increasingly complex contexts in which public policy is developed, and Kirkwood suggested that federal and public scientists need to come to grips with the reality that there is no absolute truth, even in the natural sciences.
Congress celebrates the vitality and quality of Canadian research contributions, and helps train the next generation of Canadian ideas leadership. What role does the university play in dealing with the very concrete threats of isolationism, abuse of minorities, and the closing of borders in nations around the world and here in Canada? Professors Homa Hoodfar, Bessma Momani, and Anver Saloojee spoke at length on this subject, as well as on the related issues of academic freedom and public engagement.