Perhaps best in the preface, which is also where you would talk about why there is a new edition, etc. In the case of Ruth Selig writing about the death of her twin, providing the personal details up front would be important, for example. The alternative is not to express your position clearly up front and to weave it into the fabric of the biography so that the reader has to read the book to find it.
Critics may object to this. My impression is that you want to suggest your conclusions or viewpoint up front but express them more fully and strongly in the concluding chapter, if there are conclusions to be made. Obviously it should be done well, if the latter is true even some of the time, but some people skip it.
Personally, I think it's important that everything in the book be interesting, because you never know where the reader will start, and you even want the ending to be good, so they leave feeling satisfied and you get good word of mouth. I tend to put acknowledgments at the back but try to make them interesting, to give them content. When does one use a prologue or epilogue? Linda Lear wrote a prologue a term from dramaturgy to start her biography of Rachel Carson.
A prologue is an act, scene, event, or development that precedes the main action of the book.
Account Options
If you have a prologue, you must also have an epilogue, says Marc Pachter -- as in classical drama. An epilogue provides comments outside the main action that give insight into what happened. The main actions in the book may take place in one period and the reader will want to know what happened afterward.
That kind of follow-up could appear in an epilogue. A lot of people misspell foreword as foreward or even forward!
An Introduction to Book History - David Finkelstein, Alistair McCleery - Google Книги
It is a "word" be"fore" the book itself. The foreword is usually written by someone other than the author. Noreen Malone, New Republic, Women, Work, and the Will to Lead , a page book for which she thanks people. Why do writers whose prose is clean and clear turn into gushing Kate Winslets in the thank-you pages of their books? Or is the convention a result of the underlying principle of reading order? See also Anatomy of a Book: The Physical Parts e. Jacci Howard Bear, About. It is generally accepted that its purpose is to indicate that the page on which it appears is purposely bereft of content.
Yet the very inclusion of this phrase nullifies its intent: Quick Links E-mail Pat pat at patmcnees dot com. About Pat site host. Book Fairs, Festivals in U. Writers on Writing complete archive of the NY Times series, writers exploring literary themes. Letters of Note fascinating letters, postcards, telegrams, faxes, and memos--that you were never expected to see. Aha Moments from the brilliant Mutual of Omaha campaign to record people's stories about moments of clarity, defining moments when they gained the wisdom to change their life.
Ideas worth sharing Riveting talks by remarkable people, free to the world. Local idiot to post comment on the Internet The Onion. Freelance National Anthem Bill Dyszel, 4 minutes. KeepMeOut addicted to a website? Today's Front Pages check out Newseum's U.
History of books
Online Education Database resources to help you write better, faster, or more persuasively. Help a reporter out HARO useful for reporters and for sources. Moreover, though it treats things in a cursory way in order to convey breadth, it does so without feeling like it sacrifices much more than depth. Aug 23, John rated it liked it Shelves: Jun 09, Jeannie rated it really liked it. For readers seeking an accessible introduction to academic literature on the development of printing technology and the book, this is a great overview.
It will not be for everyone but I loved it. Jennifer Meadows rated it it was amazing Dec 26, Anne Marie rated it it was ok Feb 28, Alexander M Nandan rated it liked it Jun 12, Leif Garinto rated it liked it Aug 30, Kaylie Hajek rated it it was ok Dec 27, Chelsea rated it really liked it Nov 05, Hannah rated it really liked it Nov 13, Amelia rated it liked it Sep 28, Bernard rated it really liked it Oct 29, Carrie rated it really liked it Oct 23, Sara rated it really liked it Jan 15, Valerie rated it liked it May 16, Mikael Cerbing rated it really liked it Sep 11, Allie rated it it was ok Feb 20, Garth Reese rated it liked it Oct 26, Laura Nelson rated it liked it Apr 17, Michaela rated it it was ok Jul 14, Lauren Wagers rated it it was ok Mar 16, Shelley Diemart rated it really liked it Jan 17, Pamela Kincheloe rated it it was amazing Jun 01, Mustafa Altug Yayla rated it liked it Dec 21, Steffen rated it really liked it Nov 18, Kim rated it really liked it Apr 25, Sep 17, Holly rated it liked it.
A good, concise, overview of book history. There are no discussion topics on this book yet.